PRIORITY EVENTS DETERMINATION FOR THE RISK-ORIENTED MANAGEMENT OF ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM
Abstract
The task of risk-oriented management of the electric power system in conditions of multi-criteria choice is considered. To determine the most effective measures, the implementation of which will reduce the magnitude of the risk of an emergency situation, multi-criteria analysis methods are applied. A comparative analysis of the multi-criteria alternative (ELECTRE) ranking method based on utility theory and the Pareto method, which defines a subset of non-dominant alternatives, is carried out. The Pareto method uses in its algorithm only qualitative characteristics of the advantage and allows only to distinguish a group of competitive solutions with the same degrees of non-dominance. Given the large number of evaluation criteria, the Pareto method is ineffective because the resulting subset of activities is in the field of effective trade-offs, when no element of the set of measures can be improved without degrading at least one of the other elements. The ELECTRE method is a pairwise comparison of multi-criteria alternatives based on utility theory. This method allows to identify a subset of the most effective activities. The number of elements of the resultant subset is regulated by taking into account the coefficients of importance of optimization criteria and expert preferences.
Downloads
References
Kosteriev, M. V., Bardyk, Ye. I., Litvinov, V. V. (2014). Vyznachennia Pareto-optymalnykh rishen pry ryzyk-oriientovanomu preventyvnomu upravlinni rezhymamy elektroenerhetychnoi systemy. Hidroenerhetyka Ukrainy, 4, 51–54.
Handschin, E., Jurgens, I., Neumann, C., Rehtanz, C. (2008). Long term optimization for risk-oriented asset management. 16th Power Systems Computation Conference. Glasgow. Available at: https://www.pscc-central.org/uploads/tx_ethpublications/pscc2008_597.pdf
Zickler, U., Schnettler, A., Zhang, X., Gockenbach, E. (2007). Statistical approach for component state evaluation implemented in asset management of distribution systems. 19th International Conference of Electricity Distribution. Vienna.
Schwan, M., Schilling, C., Zickler, U., Schnettler, A. (2006). Component reliability prognosis in asset management methods. 9th International Conference of Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems. Stockholm. doi: 10.1109/pmaps.2006.360287
Wang, Q. (2013). Risk-based security-constrained optimal power flow: Mathematical fundamentals computational strategies, validation, and use within electricity markets. Iowa State University, 178.
Kosteriev, M. V., Bardyk, Ye. I., Litvinov, V. V. (2013). Nechitko-statystychnyi pidkhid do otsiniuvannia ekspluatatsiinoi ta rezhymnoi nadiinosti ob’iektiv pidsystem elektroenerhetychnoi systemy. Naukovi pratsi Donetskoho natsionalnoho tekhnichnoho universytetu. Seriia: «Elektrotekhnika i enerhetyka», 1 (14), 122–128.
Litvinov, V. V. (2014). Nechitko-statystychnyi pidkhid do otsiniuvannia ryzyku poshkodzhennia obmotky statora hidroheneratora. Hidroenerhetyka Ukrainy, 2-3, 74–80.
Orlovskiy, S. A. (1981). Problemy prinyatiya resheniy pri nechetkoy iskhodnoy informatsii. Moscow: Nauka, 208.
Kosterev, M., Litvinov, V. (2016). Development of fuzzy statistical method of optimal resource allocation among technical departments of an electric utility company. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3 (4 (81)), 20–27. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2016.70522
Larichev, O. I. (2000). Teoriya i metody prinyatiya resheniy. Moscow: Logos, 296.
Larichev, O. I., Pavlova, L. I., Osipova, E. A. (1990). Mnogokriterial'nye zadachi s konstruiruemymi variantami resheniy pri ogranichennykh resursakh. Problemy i metody prinyatiya unikal'nykh i povtoryayushhikhsya resheniy, 10, 45–69.
Royzenzon, G. V. (2008). Interaktivnye metody snizheniya razmernosti priznakovogo prostranstva v zadachakh mnogokriterial'nogo prinyatiya resheniy. Moscow, 25.
Figueira, J. (2009). ELECTRE Methods. INESC-Coimbra, 34.
Sevkli, M. (2010). An application of the fuzzy ELECTRE method for supplier selection. International Journal of Production Research, 48 (12), 3393–3405. doi: 10.1080/00207540902814355
Domarev, V. V. (2002). Bezopasnost' informatsionnykh tekhnologiy. Metodologiya sozdaniya sistem zashhity. Kyiv: OOO «TID «DS», 688.
Remennikov, V. B. (2005). Upravlencheskie resheniya. Minsk: Yuniti, 144.
Zadeh, L. A. (1973). Outline of a New Approach to the Analysis of Complex Systems and Decision Processes. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 3 (1), 28–44. doi: 10.1109/tsmc.1973.5408575
Saaty, T. L. (1990). Eigenvector and logarithmic least squares. European Journal of Operational Research, 48 (1), 156–160. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(90)90073-k
Asai, K., Vatada, D., Ivai, S. et. al.; Terano, T., Asai, K., Sugeno, M. (Eds.) (1993). Prikladnye nechetkie sistemy. Moscow: Mir, 368.
Borisov, A. N., Alekseev, A. V., Merkur'ev, G. V. (1989). Obrabotka nechetkoy informatsii v sistemakh prinyatiya resheniy. Moscow: Radio i svyaz, 304.
Copyright (c) 2018 Mykola Kosterev, Volodymyr Litvinov
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.
Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.