CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF FROZEN BIOFORTIFIED PEPPER AND PUMPKIN
Abstract
Practicability of the use of biofortified sweet pepper of Zoloto Skifov variety and pumpkins of Sviten variety for processing by freezing is proved. The test samples were grown using a liquid, organic, environmentally friendly fertilizers “Riverm” (control – vegetables that were grown using standard technology). Vegetables were frozen at –23 °C after preconditioning and packaging. Storage of finished products was at –18 °C for 6 months. The research found that during the freezing and storage of vegetables gradual loss of sugars is occurred. Biofortified frozen pepper at 6-th month of storage contains 87.9 % of total initial sugar, biofortified frozen pumpkin – 59.5 %.
Test samples of peppers and pumpkins after storage are more valuable for the sugar content than the controls. Changes of pectin amount were observeded during the freezing and storage of samples. After 6 months their content increased by an average of 52 % of the original content in the used raw materials. Tissue content immediately after freezing peppers and pumpkins also increased on average by 61 %, but after 3 months of storage began to decline and these changes lasted until the end of life. Freezing had an impact on the amount of hemicellulose in frozen vegetables. After 6 months of storage biofortified vegetables contained an average of 58.1 % of hemicellulose in comparison with its original content. During the freezing and storage of test and control samples of peppers and pumpkins, there is a general pattern of change in the content of sugars and polysaccharides, but after 6 months of storage the most valuable are biofortified vegetables. This is due to the high nutritional value of fresh biofortified vegetables that were used for processing.
Downloads
References
Barskaia, I. E., Ladyzhanskiy, I. A., Fedorenko, V. T. (1989). Effektivnost proizvodstva bystrozamorozhennoy plodoovoshchnoy produktsii. Moscow: Agropromizdat, 141.
Orlova, N. Ya., Belinska S. O. (2005). Zamorozheni plodoovochevi produkty: problemy formuvannia asortymenty ta yakosti. Kyiv: Kyivskyi natsionalnyi torhivelno-ekonomihnyi universitet, 336.
Burlaka, O. M.& Sorochynskyy B. V. (2010). Roslynni biotekhnolohii: biofortyfikatsiia kharchovykh roslyn. Кuiv: DІА, 88.
Dubinina, A. A., Shcherbakova, T. V., Shaporova, T. N. et. al. (1997). Vliyaniye razlichnykh faktorov na izmenenie soderzhania karotinoidov v tykve. Aktualni naukovo-metodychni problemy v pidhotovtsi spetsialistiv vyshchoi kvalifikatsii dlia torhivli i kharchuvannia. Kharkiv: KHDATOKH, 1, 48–50.
Dubinina, A. A., Chuyko, L. O., Shaporova, T. N., Ovchynnikova I. F. (1999). Pro kharchovu tsinnist rozroblenoi pasty z morkvy. Novi tekhnolohii ta udoskonalennia protsesiv kharchovykh vyrobnytstv. Kharkiv: KHDATOKH, 232–234.
Dubinina, A. A., Maliuk , L. P., Shaporova, T. N., Penkina, N. M. (2000). Pasta iz tykvy. Pitanie i obshchestvo, 9, 28.
Shaporova, T. N. (2002). Formuvannia spozhyvnykh vlastyvostey past z harbuza ta morkvy. Kharkiv, 154.
Dubinina, A. A., Letuta, T. M., Popova T. M. (2009). Doslidzhennia khimichnoho skladu botanichnykh sortiv harbuza, raynovanykh u Skhidniy Ukraini. Progresyvni tekhnika ta tekhnolohii kharchovykh vyrobnytstv restorannoho hospodarstva i torhivli. Kharkiv: KHDATOKH, 1, 500–509.
Dubinina, A. A. (2014). Naukove obgruntuvannia formuvannia spozhyvnykh vlastyvostei fortyfikovanykh past iz fruktiv ta ovochiv. Kharkiv, 430.
Dubinina, A. A., Olkhovska, V. S., Yancheva, M. O. (2013). Botanichni osoblyvosti perspektyvnykh sortiv tomativ dlia vyrobnytstva kontsentrovanykh produktiv. Kharkiv: KHDATOKH, 129.
Olkhovska, V. S. (2009). Vdoskonalennia yakosti kontsentrovanykh tomatoproduktiv b protsesi ikh vyrobnytstva. Kharkiv, 170.
Lenert, S. O. (2011). Formuvannia yakosti ovochevo-syrkovykh past pidvyshchenoi biolohichnoi tsinnosti. Kyiv, 20.
Dubinina, S. O., Maliuk, L. P., Popova, T. M. (2007). Doslidzhennia khimichnoho skladu bilykh koreneplodiv. Progresyvni tekhnika ta tekhnolohii kharchovykh vyrobnytstv restorannoho hospodarstva i torhivli. Kharkiv : KHDATOKH, 208–215.
DSTU 4954:2008 (2009). Produkty pererobky fruktiv ta ovochiv. Metody vyznachennia tsukriv: Kyiv : Derzhspozhyvstandart Ukrainy, 17.
GOST 29059-91(1992). Produkty pererabotki plodov i ovoshchey. Titrometricheskiy metod opredeleniia pektinobykh veshchestv. Moscow: Izdatelstvo standartov, 8.
GOST 28561-90 (1990). Produkty pererabotki plodov i ovoshchey. Metody opredeleniia sukhikh veshchestv I vlahi. Moscow: Izdatelstvo standartov, 14.
GOST 13496.2-91 (1993). Korma, kombikorma, kombikormovoe syrye. Metod opredeleniia syroy kletchatki. Moscow: Izdatelstvo standartov, 6.
GOST 101845-98 (1998). Zerno i produkty ego pererabotki. Metod opredeleniia krakhmala. Moscow: Izdatelstvo standartov, 4.
Copyright (c) 2016 Gregoriy Deinychenko, Olha Yudicheva
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.
Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.