Evaluation of doctors’ assessment of healthy lifestyle: cross-sectional study

Keywords: Public health, non-communicable diseases, health communication healthy lifestyle, cluster analysis


The aim. To study the factors of doctors’ assessment of their lifestyle as a healthy one, as well as their readiness to take practical measures for health maintenance.

Materials and methods. 167 doctors representing all macro regions of Ukraine were interviewed: the levels of awareness of myths about NCDs, locus of control and readiness to take practical measures aimed at health maintenance were determined. The main acting forces were determined by factor analysis. Cluster analysis was performed on the basis of the obtained factors using hierarchical (Ward’s method) and non-hierarchical (k-means method) clustering methods.

Results. The following concepts were assessed: Myths about NCDs (11 factors, 3 elements, 4 clusters), locus of control (12 factors, 3 elements, 4 clusters), factors influencing health behavior (12 factors, 3 elements, 4 clusters), readiness to take practical measures aimed at health maintenance (22 factors, 4 elements, 2 clusters). Factors that positively and negatively affect a person's assessment of the lifestyle as a healthy one were identified.

Conclusions. The selected subgroups (clusters) of respondents are a simple and effective method of building a better understanding of the target audience of campaigns to promote healthy lifestyles, which after proper clarification, verification and development of a reliable measurement tool can be used to create targeted messages for each population group after a proper clarification and verification


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Kostyantyn Balashov, Shupyk National Healthcare University of Ukraine

Department for Communications

Gennady Slabkiy, Uzhhorod National University

Department of Public Health


World Health Organization. Global action plan for the prevention and control of non-communicable diseases 2013–2020 (2013). Geneva, 103.

World Health Organization. Global action plan on physical activity 2018–2030: more active people for a healthier world (2018). Geneva, 104.

World Health Organization. Non-communicable diseases country profiles 2018 (2018). Geneva, 223.

Abraham, T. (2010). The price of poor pandemic communication. British Medical Journal, 340. doi: http://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c2952

Znamenska, M. A. (2015). Medyko-sotsialne obgruntuvannia systemy komunikatsii v okhoroni zdorovia. Kyiv: NMAPO imeni P.L. Shupyka, 316. Tonsaker, T., Bartlett, G., Trpkov, C. (2014). Health information on the Internet. Gold mine or minefield? Can Fam Physician, 60 (5), 407–408.

Nejašmić, D., Miošić, I., Vrdoljak, D., Permozer Hajdarović, S., Tomičić, M., Gmajnić, R. et. al. (2017). Awareness and use of evidence-based medicine information among patients in Croatia: a nation-wide cross-sectional study. Croatian Medical Journal, 58 (4), 300–301. doi: http://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2017.58.300

Tan, S. S.-L., Goonawardene, N. (2017). Internet Health Information Seeking and the Patient-Physician Relationship: A Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19 (1), e9. doi: http://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5729

Craig Lefebvre, R., Flora, J. A. (1988). Social Marketing and Public Health Intervention. Health Education Quarterly, 15 (3), 299–315. doi: http://doi.org/10.1177/109019818801500305

Grier, S., Bryant, C. A. (2005). Social marketing in public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 26 (1), 319–339. doi: http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.26.021304.144610

Rothschild, M. L. (1999). Carrots, Sticks, and Promises: A Conceptual Framework for the Management of Public Health and Social Issue Behaviors. Journal of Marketing, 63 (4), 24–37. doi: http://doi.org/10.2307/1251972

Hong, C., Kotler, P., Nancy, L. (2009). Social Marketing for Public Health: Global Trends and Success Stories. Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Vuik, S. I., Mayer, E., Darzi, A. (2016). A quantitative evidence base for population health: applying utilization-based cluster analysis to segment a patient population. Population Health Metrics, 14 (1). doi: http://doi.org/10.1186/s12963-016-0115-z

Balashov, K. V., Slabkii, G. O., Gulchіi, O. P., Zakharova, N. M. (2020). Conceptual framework of psychographic research in the field of prevention of non-communicable diseases. Ukrainian Medical Journal, 139. doi: http://doi.org/10.32471/umj.1680-3051.139.191002

European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Social marketing guide for public health managers and practitioners (2014). Stockholm. doi: http://doi.org/10.2900/41449

Balku, E., Tóth, G., Nárai, E., Zsiros, E., Varsányi, P., Vitrai, J. (2017). Methodology for identification of healthstyles for developing effective behavior change interventions. Journal of Public Health, 25 (4), 387–400. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-017-0799-y

Betsch, C., Böhm, R., Airhihenbuwa, C. O., Butler, R., Chapman, G. B., Haase, N. et. al. (2016). Improving Medical Decision Making and Health Promotion through Culture-Sensitive Health Communication. Medical Decision Making, 36(7), 811–833. doi: http://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x15600434

Engl, E., Smittenaar, P., Sgaier, S. K. (2019). Identifying population segments for effective intervention design and targeting using unsupervised machine learning: an end-to-end guide. Gates Open Research, 3, 1503. doi: http://doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.13029.2

Slater, M. D., Flora, J. A. (1991). Health Lifestyles: Audience Segmentation Analysis for Public Health Interventions. Health Education Quarterly, 18 (2), 221–233. doi: http://doi.org/10.1177/109019819101800207

Smith, A., Humphreys, S., Heslington, L., La Placa, V., Mcvey, D., MacGregor, E. (2011). The healthy foundations life-stage segmentation. Research report no. 2: The qualitative analysis of the motivation segments.

Nárai, E. (2009). Healthstyle segmentation, attitudes to health. Eötvös Loránd University.

👁 63
⬇ 18
How to Cite
Balashov, K., Hulchiy, O., & Slabkiy, G. (2021). Evaluation of doctors’ assessment of healthy lifestyle: cross-sectional study. EUREKA: Health Sciences, (2), 16-23. https://doi.org/10.21303/2504-5679.2021.001709
Medicine and Dentistry