MODERN CHALLENGES OF GLOBALIZATION PROCESSES AND INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION AS AN ANSWER TO THEM
Abstract
This study, the object of which is globalization in its modern modifications, is devoted to the analysis of trends in the deployment of globalization processes in modern sociocultural contexts. The features of postmodern societies, which are informational and multicultural societies, risk and knowledge societies are analyzed. Based on the author’s comprehensive research methodology, globalization, its structure, semantics, functional range and constructive potential are considered. Particular attention is paid to intercultural communication as a tool to overcome possible "zones of misunderstanding." It turns out its horizontal and vertical dimensions, gender communication is considered as an example of horizontal deployment. The role of education and upbringing in the formation of the imperative of tolerance is highlighted. It is proved in the work that taking into account the unity of these measurements is of fundamental importance for increasing the efficiency of the formation of a person’s readiness to respond to life's challenges.
Investigated problem. Among modern challenges, globalization pays special attention, absorbs light at an accelerated pace. Despite the fact that this thematic field was developed by a number of researchers, this problem remains relevant today especially since sociocultural contexts are changing, emphasis is shifting. Due to the global pandemic, the corona of the virus of the state is becoming more closed. The perception of globalization processes occurs through an analysis of potential risks for self-preservation. Despite this, integration processes continue, therefore, teaching a person intercultural communication skills remains relevant.
The main scientific results. The scientific novelty of research is to create a metatheoretical model of globalization and intercultural communication as its component in general civilization and national contexts on the basis of the author’s methodological program, the application of which made it possible to significantly deepen the understanding of the globalization construct, to reveal the functional potential of intercultural communication as necessary in the construction and implementation of successful life-saving strategies.
Scope of the practical application of the research results. Practical value is determined by the totality of the analyzed problems, which expand the horizons of understanding the phenomenon of globalization and intercultural communication. The proposed methodological research program can be used in the further development of problems of national education strategies in the era of globalization, in the teaching of special courses in the philosophy of education, theoretical and comparative pedagogy, the sociology of education and culture. The results of the study were introduced into the educational process of the H. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University, the Ternopil V. Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University, the Kharkiv College of Trade and Economics of the Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics.
Downloads
References
Huntington, S. P. (1993). The Clash of Civilizations? Foreign Affairs, 72 (3), 22–49. doi: http://doi.org/10.2307/20045621
Burbules, N. С.; Neiman, A. (Ed.) (1996). Postmodern Doubt and Philosophy of Education. Philosophy of Education 1995. Urbana: Philosophy of Educational Society, 39–48.
Habermas, J. (1981). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Bd. 2. Frankfurt am Main. Suhrkamp.
Uest, K., Zimmerman, D.; Zdravomyslovoi, E., Temkinoi, A. (2000). Sozdanie gendera. Khrestomatiia feministskikh tekstov. Saint Petersburg: Izdatelstvo «Dmitrii Bulanin», 193–219.
Batler, Dzh. (2000). Gendernoe bespokoistvo. Gl. 1. Subekty pola/ gendera/ zhelaniia. Antologiia gendernoi teorii. Minsk: Propilei, 297–346.
Marushchenko, O., Plakhotnik, O. (2012). Henderni shkilni istorii. Kharkiv: Monohraf, 88.
Andrusik, O., Vodolazhskaia, N., Efimceva, A. et. al.; Andrusik, O., Maruschenko, O. (Eds.) (2013). V poiskakh gendernogo vospitaniia. Kharkiv: Zolotye stranicy, 144.
Andrusyk, O., Marushchenko, O., Masalitina, O. (Eds.) (2018). Hender yide. Kharkiv: Planeta – Prynt, 128.
Skinder, N. V., Torianik, I. P. (2020). Ways of Promoting Gender Education. Osvita i nauka u minlyvomu sviti: problemy ta perspektyvy rozvytku. Dnipro: SPD «Okhotnik», 1, 273–274.
Orestad College. Available at: http: //cikavo.com/article/7853.html
Burbules, N. C. (1993). Dialogue in Teaching: Theory and Practice. New York: Teachers College Press. Columbia University, 23–76.
Meyers Enzyklopädisches Lexikon (1980). Bd. 6. Berlin: Akad.-Verlag.
Tryniak, M. V. (2011). Interkulturna komunikatsiia v osviti: tendentsiia rozghortannia u suchasnykh sotsiokulturnykh kontekstakh. Kharkiv.
Thomas, A.; Thomas, A. (Ed.) (1993). Psychologie des interkulturelles Lernens und Handelns. Kulturvergleichende Psychologie. Eine Einführung. Göttingen-Toronto: Klett, 377–424
Selby, D. (2000). Global Education as Transformative Education. Zeitschrift fur internationale Bildungsforschung und Entwicklungspadagogik, 23 (3), 2–10.
Apel, K.-O. (1996). Obgruntuvannia etyky vidpovidalnosti. Pershodzherela komunikatyvnoi filosofii. Kyiv. Lybid, 46–59.
Apel, K.-O. (1998). Auseinandersetzungen in Erprobung des transzedentalpragmatischen Ansatzes. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Batyshchev, H. S. (1997). Dyalektyka obshchenyia. Moscow: Nauka.
Bakhtin, M. M. (2000). Avtor i geroi: K filosofskim osnovam gumanitarnykh nauk. Saint Petersburg: Azbuka, 336.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). K filosofii postupka. Filosofiia i sociologiia nauki i tekhniki. Ezhegodnik, 1984–1985. Moscow: Nauka, 80–159.
Bolnov, O. F., Sytnychenko, L. A. (1996). Zustrich. Pershodzherela komunikatyvnoi filosofii. Kyiv: Lybid, 157–170.
Buber, M. (1995). Ia i ty. Moscow: Respublika.
Birkenbeil, E. J. (1984). Erziehungsphilosophie des Dialogischen. Frankfurt am Main: Verlag Peter Lang.
Luhmann, N. (1996). Einführung in die Systemtheorie. Heidelberg: Kohlhammer.
Luhmann, N. (1986). Ökologische Kommunikation. Opladen: Leske&Budrich. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-94325-5
Andrushchenko, V. P. (2004). Rozdumy pro osvitu: Statti, narysy, interviu. Kyiv: Znannia Ukrainy, 804.
Andrushchenko, V. P. (2006). Filosofiia osvity KhKhI stolittia: u poshukakh perspektyvy. Filosofiia osvity, 1 (3), 6–12.
Kultaieva, M. D., Navrotskyi, O. I., Sheremet, I. I. (2008). Yevropeiska teoretychna sotsiolohiia XX–XXI stolittia. Kharkiv: KhNU imeni V. N. Karazina, 332.
Kultaieva, M., Prokopenko, I. F., Radionova, I. O., Trotsko, H. V. (2008). Sotsiolohiia hlobalizatsii. Kharkiv: KhNPU imeni H. S. Skovorody.
Valdenfels, B. (2009). Mirkuvannia shchodo henealohii kultury. Filosofska dumka, 1, 13–26.
Valdenfels, B. (2004). Topohrafiia Chuzhoho: studii z fenomenolohii Chuzhoho. Kyiv: PPS, 206.
Malakhov, V. (1991). Natsiia v poli kulturi. Filosofska i sotsiolohichna dumka, 8, 94–98.
Abolina, T. H., Yermolenko, A. M., Kyselova, O. O., Malakhov, V. A. (1997). Problema obgruntuvannia etychnykh norm i tsinnostei v konteksti kultury: transformatsiia i mezhi ontolohichnoho pidkhodu. Etychni normy i tsinnosti: problemy obgruntuvannia. Kyiv: Stylos, 6–66.
Sennett, R. (1998). The Corrosion of Character. New York.
Sennett, R. (1970). The Uses of Disorder. New York, London: Un. Press.
Teilor, Ch. (2002). Etyka avtentychnosti. Kyiv: Dukh i litera, 128.
Teilor, Ch. (2004). Multykulturalizm i „Polityka vyznannia”. Kyiv: Alterpres.
Copyright (c) 2020 Maya Trynyak, Viktoriia Tykhonovych, Nataliia Skinder, Iryna Torianik, Nataliia Rezenkina, Tetiana Teterina
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.
Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.
