Keywords: fractures of the proximal femur, comorbidities, comorbid burden, functional levels, quality of life, medical and epidemiological characteristics, anamnestic characteristics


The aim of the research: correlation levels of the psychological component of quality of life and medical-epidemiological characteristics of patients with fractures of the proximal thigh.

Solved problem: to determine the possibility of predicting the impact of medical-epidemiological and anamnestic characteristics of patients with fractures of the proximal thigh on their quality of life after treatment of fractures of the proximal thigh.

Main scientific results: natural increase in comorbidity in the presence of comorbidities, low functional status and an increase in age characteristics were established. The probable influence of comorbidity on the decrease of the functional state according to the ASA classification also stated. An increase in the duration of treatment of patients with surgical treatment and a longer period of injury marked. The decrease in the quality of life of patients with increasing age characteristics, increasing comorbidity and reducing the indicators of functional status according to the ASA classification have been established.

Area of practical use of research results: medical institutions of traumatological profile.

Innovative technological product: determining the ability to predict the quality of life of patients after treatment of fractures of the proximal thigh, which allows you to predict the results of treatment such patients.

Scope of application of the innovative technological product: clinical medical traumatological practice of use of possibilities of forecasting of results of treatment of fractures of proximal hip department.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Tamara Hurbanova, Kharkiv Academy of Postgraduate Education

Department of Traumatology, Anesthesiology and Military Surgery


Kalchenko, A. V. (2019). Our experience of application of single-pole endoprosthesis in the proximal femur fractures in the elderly and senile patients. Trauma, 20 (3), 42–48. doi:

Titov, R. S., Fine, A. M., Vaza, A. Y., Bogolubskii, Y. A., Mazhorova, I. I., Bondarev, V. B., Sergeev, A. Y. (2019). Comparative analysis of treatment of patients with neck fractures of the femur. Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Medical Rehabilitation, 1 (4), 20–26. doi:

NTDB Annual Report 2011 (2011). Chicagoo, Illinois: American College of Surgeons, 157 p. American College of Surgeons. Available at: %20programs/trauma/ntdb/ntdbannualreport2011.ashx

Cook, A. C., Joseph, B., Inaba, K., Nakonezny, P. A., Bruns, B. R., Kerby, J. D. et. al. (2016). Multicenter external validation of the Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score: a study by the prognostic assessment of life and limitations after trauma in the elderly (PALLIATE) consortium. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 80 (2), 204–209. doi:

Lee, D. R., Lee, J., Rota, M., Lee, J., Ahn, H. S., Park, S. M., Shin, D. (2014). Coffee consumption and risk of fractures: A systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis. Bone, 63, 20–28. doi:

Gaba, S., Agrawal, P., Das, S., Singh, R., Kumar, A., Yadav, G. (2017). Dynamic hip screw versus proximal femur locking compression plate in intertrochanteric femur fractures (AO 31A1 and 31A2): A prospective randomized study. Journal of Natural Science, Biology and Medicine, 8 (1), 87–93. doi:

Patel, N. K., Sarraf, K. M., Joseph, S., Lee, C., Middleton, F. R. (2013). Implementing the National Hip Fracture Database: An audit of care. Injury, 44 (12), 1934–1939. doi:

Nirula, R., Gentilello, L. M. (2004). Futility of resuscitation criteria for the «young» old and the «old» old trauma patient: a National Trauma Data Bank analysis. The Journal of trauma, 57 (1), 37–41. doi:

Attum, B., Pilson, H. (2020). Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture. Florida: StatPearls Publishing.

Miller, G. W., Godrey, J. J., Sagmeister, M. L., Lewis, T. L. (2016). Provision of fascia iliaca compartment block in the acute management of proximal femoral fractures: A national observational study of UK hospitals. Injury, 47 (11), 2490–2494. doi:

Andreeva, T. M., Ohrizko, E. V., Popova, M. M. (2017). Travmatyzm, ortopedycheskaia zabolevaemost, sostoianye travmatoloho-ortopedycheskoi pomoshchy naselenyiu Rossyy v 2016 h. Moscow: Mynysterstvo Zdravookhranenyia Rossyiskoi Federatsyy, 149.

Miller, B. J., Callaghan, J. J., Cram, P., Karam, M., Marsh, J. L., Noiseux, N. O. (2014). Changing Trends in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 96 (17), e149. doi:

Kryvenko, V. I., Kachan, I. S., Pakhomova, S. P., Fedorova, O. P., Kolesnyk, M. Yu., Nepriadkina, I. V., Hrinenko, T. Yu. (2015). Yakist zhyttia ta prykhylnist do likuvannia v klinitsi vnutrishnikh khvorob. Zaporizhzhia: Zaporizkyi derzhavnyi medychnyi universytet, 80.

Marsault, L. V., Ryg, J., Madsen, C. F., Holsgaard-Larsen, A., Lauritsen, J., Schmal, H. (2020). Objectively Measured Physical Activity and Its Association with Functional Independence, Quality of Life and In-Hospital Course of Recovery in Elderly Patients with Proximal Femur Fractures: A Prospective Cohort Study. Rehabilitation Research and Practice, 2020, 1–10. doi:

Campenfeldt, P., Ekström, W., Al-Ani, A. N., Weibust, E., Greve, K., Hedström, M. (2020). Health related quality of life and mortality 10 years after a femoral neck fracture in patients younger than 70 years. Injury, 51 (10), 2283–2288. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2020.06.029

Amarilla-Donoso, F. J., López-Espuela, F., Roncero-Martín, R., Leal-Hernandez, O., Puerto-Parejo, L. M., Aliaga-Vera, I. et. al. (2020). Quality of life in elderly people after a hip fracture: a prospective study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 18 (1). doi:

👁 147
⬇ 113
How to Cite
Innovative technologies in healthcare