Integral estimation of activity of entrepreneurial universities: practical aspect

Keywords: entrepreneurial university, integrated indicator, ranking, educational institutions, global development


Investigated problem. Implementation of the concept of an entrepreneurial university necessitates the formation of a system of activity indicators of educational institutions.

The main scientific results. It is specified that the activity of entrepreneurial universities and educational institutions that try to comply with this concept should be systematically rated. The author analyzes modern approaches to estimation of the activity of entrepreneurial universities. The own viewpoint to this evaluation on the basis of calculation of an integrated indicator is offered. The main stages of the algorithm for estimating the activity are described. An integrated activity indicator for five universities has been calculated. The ranking of educational institutions in accordance with the calculated desegregated measures and the concept of entrepreneurial university has been held. The results of the analysis showed that the studied educational institutions from the United States are more in line with the concept of the entrepreneurial university than European ones.

The area of practical use of the research results. The practical results of the study can be used in the process of estimating the activity of entrepreneurial universities.

Innovative technological product. The scientific approach to the evaluation of the activity of entrepreneurial universities proposed by the author allows to form their rating, to track the position of each educational institution in the dynamics.

Scope of application of the innovative technological product: educational policy at the micro- and macroeconomic levels.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Gulshan Bayramova, Baku Business University

University and Enterprise Center


Meissner, D., Erdil, E., Chataway, J. (Eds.) (2018). Innovation and the Entrepreneurial University. Springer, 327. doi:

Landinez L., Kliewe T., Diriba H.; Kliewe, T., Kesting, T., Plewa, C., Baaken, T. (Eds.) (2019). Entrepreneurial University Indicators in Global University Rankings. Developing Engaged and Entrepreneurial Universities. Singapore: Springer, 57–85. doi:

Guerrero, M., Cunningham, J. A., Urbano, D. (2015). Economic impact of entrepreneurial universities’ activities: An exploratory study of the United Kingdom. Research Policy, 44 (3), 748–764. doi:

Mammadli, A. (2021). Global University Rating Indicators and Suggestion for Establishment of Entrepreneur Universities in Azerbaijan. InterConf, 192–210. doi:

Kurmaiev, P. Yu., Pyzhianova, N. V. (2017). Organizational and economic mechanism of state regulation of higher education system in Ukraine. Scientific Bulletin of Polissya, 1 (1 (9)), 107–112. doi:

Sperrer, M., Müller, C., Soos, J. (2016). The Concept of the Entrepreneurial University Applied to Universities of Technology in Austria: Already Reality or a Vision of the Future? Technology Innovation Management Review, 6 (10), 37–44. doi:

University Entrepreneurship Index (2021). Illinois Science & Technology Coalition. Available at: Last accessed: 05.10.2021

Etzkowitz, H. (2017). Innovation Lodestar: The entrepreneurial university in a stellar knowledge firmament. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 122–129. doi:

Wissema, J. G. (2009). Towards the third generation university: Managing the university in transition. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. doi:

Guerrero, M., Urbano, D. (2010). The development of an entrepreneurial university. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37 (1), 43–74. doi:

Fernández-Nogueira, D., Arruti, A., Markuerkiaga, L., Saenz, N. (2018). The entrepreneurial university: A selection of good practices. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 2 1(3), 1–17.

Polishchuk, E. V. (2012). Requirements for the Indicator System Efficiency of the Enterprise. Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Economics and Management, 2, 182–189

The World University Ranking (2019). The Times Higher Education World University Ranking 2019. Available at:!/page/0/length/25/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/stats Last accessed: 07.10.2021

Ewalt, D. (2019). The World’s Most Innovative Universities – 2019. Available at: Last accessed: 07.10.2021

University comparison (2019). U-Multirank. Available at: Last accessed: 05.10.2021

Erastov, А. E., Novikovа, O. V. (2015). Method of calculation of the integral index of effective realization of regional energy efficiency programs. Vestnik IGEU, 3, 73–80. doi:

Garafonova, O. I., Kurmaiev, P. Y. (2018). Percularties of management mechanism formation by means of changes as the basis of strategic development of business organizations. Scientific Bulletin of Polissia, 3 (15), 7–11. doi:

Tai, J. (2020). Which Colleges Produce The Most Startups? Available at: Last accessed: 05.10.2021

Gabbert, J. (Ed.) (2019). Pitchbook Universities: 2018–2019 Edition. Seattle: PitchBook Data, Inc.

👁 25
⬇ 20
How to Cite
Bayramova, G. (2021). Integral estimation of activity of entrepreneurial universities: practical aspect. ScienceRise, (6), 53-59.
Lifelong learning and professional development