STUDY OF PECULIARITIES OF LAND RELATIONS THROUGH THE PRISM OF ECONOMIC THEORIES
Abstract
The paper defines the essence of the notion “land relations” and outlines their main peculiarities, based on the analysis of scientific works of classics of the world economic thought, study of the historical experience and consideration of practical aspects of lands resource use in economy. Negative results of the influence of the neoliberalism theory on the formation of land relations in Ukraine and the former USSR countries after getting independence are substantiated. Attention is accented on a necessity of taking into account national interests at reforming land relations.
The aim of the paper is to study peculiarities of land relations through the prism of economic theories, taking into account their development evolution, and formation of the complex approach to defining the essence of the notion “land relations” as an object of financial-economic regulation.
The methods of empirical and retrospective analysis of the world and native economic thought was used in the paper for separating fundamental bases of land relations; the methods of generalization and comparison of scientific approaches as to defining the essence of land relations and their elements; system approach for substantiating the economic base of land relations, determination of their elements and principles.
Key peculiarities of land relations, complexly discovering their essence, taking into account a necessity to create an effective economic-legal mechanism of their regulation within the conflict of the neoliberal economic ideology and national interests have been formulated. There has been offered a wide approach to understanding an object of land relations that is land resources; it has been proved, that realization of all legal actions with land resources results from a necessity to observe the factor of lands suverenization; the economic base of land relations has been substantiated; principles of land relations, resulting from a necessity of the rational land use, observance of national interests and guaranteeing of food safety of the state, have been outlined.
Downloads
References
Hutorov, O. I. (2017). Orendni vidnosyny – yak hnuchkyi instrument zemlehospodariuvannia v period stanovlennia rynku zemli v Ukraini. VSNAU. Seriia «Ekonomika i menedzhment», 4 (71), 81–85.
Timoshenko, M. M. (2019). Scientific and organizational bases for improvement of land relations in the context of sustainable socio-economic development of agricultural territories. The Journal of Zhytomyr State Technological University. Series: Economics, Management and Administration, 1 (87), 36–41. doi: http://doi.org/10.26642/jen-2019-1(87)-36-41
Lomakovych, V., Unkovska, T., Ilchenko, V., Bohdan, T. (2019). Rynok zemli: isnuiuchi zahrozy dlia Ukrainy ta neobkhidni zapobizhnyky. Analitychna dopovid. Growford Institute. Available at: http://landukraine.com.ua/news_post/analitychna-dopovid-growford-institute-rynok-zemli-isnuiuchi-zahrozy-dlia-ukrainy-ta-neobkhidni-zapobizhnyky
Khodakivska, O. V., Levek, R. (2018). Zemelni vidnosyny: poshuk balansu interesiv mizh derzhavnym rehuliuvanniam ta neoliberalizmom. Ekonomika APK, 6, 5–17.
Nepochatenko, O. O., Kolotukha, S. M., Borovyk, P. M., Huzar, B. S. (2017). Zemelni vidnosyny ta finansovi aspekty yikh rozvytku. Ekonomika APK, 6, 42–52.
Cai, M., Murtazashvili, I., Murtazashvili, J. (2019). The politics of land property rights. Journal of Institutional Economics, 16 (2), 151–167. doi: http://doi.org/10.1017/s1744137419000158
Belesky, P. (2015). Towards a New Political Economy of Food: State Capitalism and the Emergence of New Mercantilism in the Global Food System. The University of Warwick: New Directions in International Political Economy. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3473843
Banerdzhi, A., Duflo, E. (2018). Ekonomika bidnosti. Yak zvilnyty svit vid zlydniv. Kyiv: Nash format, 312.
Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of Economics. Available at: http://files.libertyfund.org/files/1676/Marshall_0197_EBk_v6.0.pdf
Troian, I. (2010). Derzhavnyi suverenitet yak politolohichna katehoriia: sutnist, kharakterystyky, osoblyvosti transformatsii. Ukrainska natsionalna ideia: realii ta perspektyvy rozvytku, 22, 130–136.
Batterbury, S. P. J., Ndi, F.; Binns, J. A., Lynch, K., Nel, E. (Eds.) (2018). Land grabbing in Africa. The Routledge Handbook of African Development. London: Routledge, 573–582. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322790095_Land-grabbing_in_Africa
Yermolenko, V. M., Kurylo, V. I., Kyryliuk, T. S. (2007). Pravove zabezpechennia okhorony ta ratsionalnoho vykorystannia zemelnykh resursiv. Kyiv: Mahistr. XXI st., 248.
Fedorov, M. M. (2009). Transformatsiia zemelnykh vidnosyn do rynkovykh umov. Ekonomika APK, 3, 4–18.
OON: Konflikty v sviti vybukhaiut zazvychai cherez pryrodni resursy (2014). Available at: https://dt.ua/WORLD/oon-konflikti-v-sviti-vibuhayut-zazvichay-cherez-prirodni-resursi-155895_.html
Pankiv, Z. P. (2008). Zemelni resursy. Vydavnychyi tsentr LNU imeni Ivana Franka, 272.
Kene, F., Tiurgo, A. R. Zh., Diupon de Nemur, P. S. (2008). Fiziokraty. Izbrannye ekonomicheskie proizvedeniia. Eksmo, 1200.
Petti, U. (1993). Traktat o nalogakh i sborakh. SHedevry mirovoi ekonomicheskoi mysli. Vol. 2. Petrokommerts, 320.
Smit, A. (1962). Issledovanie o prirode i prichinakh bogatstva narodov. Moscow: Sotsekgiz, 684.
Rikardo, D. (1955). Nachala politicheskoi ekonomii i nalogovogo oblozheniia. Sochineniia. Vol. 1. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatelstvo politicheskoi literatury, 860.
Mill, Dzh. S. (1896). Osnovaniia politicheskoi ekonomii s nekotorymi iz ikh primenenii v obschestvennoi filosofii. Kyiv: Tipografіia I. I. Chokolova, 866.
Marks, K. (1983). Kapital. Kritika politicheskoi ekonomii. Vol. 1. Kniga 1: protsess proizvodstva kapital. Moscow: Politizdat, 592.
Marks, K. Nischeta filosofii. Otvet na «Filosofiiu nischety» g-na Prudona. Available at: https://www.esperanto.mv.ru/Marksismo/Misere/index.html
Halchynskyi, A. S. (2010). Ekonomichna metodolohiia. Lohika onovlennia. Kyiv: ADEF-Ukraina, 572.
Semiuels, U. Dzh.; Afanaseva, V. S., Entova, R. M. (Eds.) (1981). Ideologiia v ekonomicheskom analize. Sovremennaia ekonomicheskaia mysl. Seriia: «Ekonomicheskaia mysl Zapada». Moscow: Progress, 513.
Fridman, M., Fridman, R. (2017). Kapitalizm i svoboda. Kyiv: Nash format, 216.
Erkhard, L. (1993). Polveka razmyshlenii. Rechi i stati. Moscow, 608.
Kouz, R. (2007). Firma, rynok i pravo. Moscow: Novoe izdatelstvo, 224.
Duglas, N. (1997). Instituty, institutsionalnye izmeneniia i funktsionirovanie ekonomiki. Moscow, 320.
De Soto, E. (2012). Zahadka kapitalu. Chomu kapitalizm peremahaie lyshe na Zakhodi i nide bilshe. Kyiv: Nika-Tsentr, 232.
Copyright (c) 2020 Vasyl Moroz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.
Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.
