ANALYSIS OF RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE UNITED STATES IN THE PERIOD THE PRESIDENCY OF DONALD TRUMP (2017-2020)
Abstract
The European Union has met Donald Trump's presidency in a crisis, caused by Britain's exit, quarrels over migration policy and prospects for European integration. Trump has abandoned a project to create a transatlantic free trade area. He demanded a one-sided trade advantage for the United States. The rejection of the liberal project of multilateral foreign policy contributed to the deepening of contradictions between the EU and the US in the field of trade, environment, the regime of international disarmament treaties, the algorithm for resolving regional conflicts. The Trump era in US foreign policy was a time of abandoning liberal globalism. But it is impossible to realize this task in one cadence. The question is whether it is possible for Democrats to fully restore liberal globalism in equal cooperation with the European Union.Trump has abandoned the project of a transatlantic free trade area between the United States and the European Union. This shocked the European elites. Differences in approaches to world trade contributed to the coolness. The European Union is promoting a liberal approach. Trump insisted on the priority of the patronage of American interests. As a result, the tradition of relationships has suffered. Until 2017, the United States bought European goods and paid the most to the NATO budget. Trump demanded trade parity and more European funding for NATO. European elites perceived Trump's approach to migration issues as unacceptable. Trump's policy on international conflicts has become another reason for mutual misunderstanding. Trump recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and helped establish diplomatic relations between Israel and the United Arab Emirates. This has become a challenge for the European Union's Middle East policy.
Downloads
References
Booth, L., Patt, A. (2018). The Push for Proactive Climate Adaptation in Europe. Current History, 117 (797), 108–113. doi: http://doi.org/10.1525/curh.2018.117.797.108
Brauss Heinrich (2019). Der US-Truppenabzugsplan. DGAP commentary, 24. Available at: https://dgap.org/de/forschung/publikationen/der-us-truppenabzugsplan
Shapiro, J. (2018). Why Trump Can Safely Ignore Europe. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/europe/2018-05-15/why-trump-can-safely-ignore-europe
Smith, J. (2017). Trumps transatlantische Agenda. Internationale Politik, 1, 20–22. Available at: https://www.internationalepolitik.de/de/trumps-transatlantische-agenda
Transcript: Donald Trump on NATO, Turkey’s Coup Attempt and the World (2016). New York Times. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/22/us/politics/donald-trump-foreign-policy-interview.html
Schwarzer, D. (2017). Neue Deals für den Alten Kontinent. Internationale Politik 1, 8–13. Available at: https://internationalepolitik.de/de/neue-deals-fuer-den-atlen-kontinent
Trump Calls the News Media the «Enemy of the American People» (2017). New York Times. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/17/business/trump-calls-the-news-media-the-enemy-of-the-people.html
Lissner, R., Rapp, M. (2020). A Foreign policy for the Day After Trump. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2020-09-30/foreign-policy-day-after-trump
Trump’s Embrace of Strongmen Is a Very Bad Strategy (2017). Washington Post. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/trumps-embrace-of-strongmen-is-a-very-bad-strategy/2017/06/22/77f31248-577c-11e7-b38e-35fd8e0c288f_story.html
The Germans Are «Bad, Very Bad»: Trump’s Alleged Slight Generates Confusion, Backlash (2017). Washington Post. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/trumps-alleged-slight-against-germans-generates-confusion-backlash/2017/05/26/0325255a-4219-11e7-b29f-f40ffced2ddb_story.html
Copyright (c) 2020 Sergey Asaturov, Andrei Martynov

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our journal abides by the CREATIVE COMMONS copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.
Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.
