The influence of leadership styles on employee performance in construction firms
Currently, there is a dearth of research, examining how project managers' leadership styles influence the performance of construction company workers in Cape Town. Other research has discussed this subject on a national or international level. Still, comprehensive data on Cape Town construction firms is lacking. This has prevented local enterprises from understanding the role of their project managers’ leadership styles on employee performance outcomes. This article sought to ascertain how leadership styles influence employee performance in construction firms and to develop a conceptual framework for improving leadership and performance. Through quantitative techniques, 456 questionnaires were distributed at construction sites across Cape Town. Responses were then analysed using an ANOVA test (with the descriptive and regressive methods) and a post-hoc test (using the Bonferroni Method) and correlation analysis. The results reveal a statistically significant positive relationship between project managers’ leadership styles and the performance of subordinate employees. These findings have subsequently been used to develop a conceptual framework of leadership quality development tools, including training, empowerment, coaching, participation, and delegation. The research contributes to new knowledge that will promote local project managers’ leadership development, improve employee performance, and in doing so, increase successful project outcomes across the city.
Del Caño, A., de la Cruz, M. P. (2002). Integrated Methodology for Project Risk Management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128 (6), 473–485. doi: http://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(2002)128:6(473)
Liphadzi, M., Aigbavboa, C., Thwala, W. (2015). Relationship Between Leadership Styles and Project Success in the South Africa Construction Industry. Procedia Engineering, 123, 284–290. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.10.091
Toor, S., Ofori, G. (2008). Taking leadership research into future. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 15 (4), 352–371. doi: http://doi.org/10.1108/09699980810886856
Daniel, C. O., Ugochuku, N. R. (2020). Influence of Project Managers Leadership Style on Project Implementation. International Journal of Business Marketing andManagemen, 5 (2), 68–76.
Munirat, O. et. al. (2014). The relationship between leadership styles and employees' performance in organisations. European journal of business and management, 6 (22), 76–86.
Sorenson, G. J., Goethals, G. R. (2012). Leadership Theories: Overview. Encyclopedia of Leadership. doi: http://doi.org/10.4135/9781412952392.n201
Windapo, A. O., Cattell, K. (2013). The South African construction industry: Perceptions of key challenges facing its performance, development and growth. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 18 (2), 65–79.
Price, J. J. (2009) The Conception and Operationalization of leadership in construction companies. University of South Africa, 206.
Mohammad and Yarmohammadian (2006). A study of relationship between managers’ leadership style and employees’ job satisfaction’. Leadership in Health Services, 19 (2), 11–28. doi: http://doi.org/10.1108/13660750610665008
Zulch, B. (2014). Leadership Communication in Project Management. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 119, 172–181. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.021
Schaeffer, L. D. (2002) The leadership journey. Harvard Business Review. Available at: https://hbr.org/2002/10/the-leadership-journey
Boehm, S. A., Dwertmann, D. J. G., Bruch, H., Shamir, B. (2015). The missing link? Investigating organizational identity strength and transformational leadership climate as mechanisms that connect CEO charisma with firm performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 26 (2), 156–171. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.07.012
Chynoweth, C. (2008). Leaders who put onus on the led. The Times and Sunday Times, 1–2.
Iqbal, N. A. S., Haider, N. (2015). Effect of Leadership Style on Employee Performance. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 5.
Bhatti, N., Maitlo, G. M., Shaikh, N., Hashmi, M. A., Shaikh, F. M. (2012). The Impact of Autocratic and Democratic Leadership Style on Job Satisfaction. International Business Research, 5 (2). doi: http://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v5n2p192
Northouse, P. G. (2017) Comparing transformational, transactional and laissez-faire styles. Leadership: Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.
Warrilow, S. (2012) Transformational Leadership Theory – The 4 Key Components in Leading Change and Managing Change. E-Zine Articles. Available at: https://ezinearticles.com/?Transformational-Leadership-Theory---The-4-Key-Components-in-Leading-Change-and-Managing-Change&id=2755277
Odumeru, J., Ifeanyi, G. (2013). Transformational vs. transactional leadership theories: evidence in Literature. Internationational Review of Management and Business Research, 2 (2), 355–361.
Ponterotto, J. G. (2005). Qualitative research in counseling psychology: A primer on research paradigms and philosophy of science. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52 (2), 126–136. doi: http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0188.8.131.52
Brent, E., Leedy, P. D. (1990). Practical Research: Planning and Design. Teaching Sociology, 18 (2), 248. doi: http://doi.org/10.2307/1318509
Bhattacherjee, A. (2012). Social Science Research: Principles, Methods, and Practices. Available at: https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/oa_textbooks/3
Bihani, P., Patil, S. T. (2014). A Comparitive Study of Data Analysis Techniques. International Journal of Emerging Trends and Technology in Computer Science.
Carmines, E., McIver, J. (1981). Analyzing models with unobserved variables: Analysis of covariance structures. Social measurement: Current issues, 65–115.
Nunnally, J., Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric Theory. New York McGraw-Hill, 752.
Lim, E., Alum, J. (1995). Construction productivity: Issues encountered by contractors in Singapore. International Journal of Project Management, 13 (1), 51–58. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7863(95)95704-h
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16 (3), 297–334. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/bf02310555
Hopkins, W. G. (2000). Measures of Reliability in Sports Medicine and Science. Sports Medicine, 30 (5), 375–381. doi: http://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200030050-00006
King, W. R., He, J. (2006). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 43 (6), 740–755. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.05.003
Marshall, E. (2017). One-way (between-groups) ANOVA steps in SPSS.
Uyanık, G. K., Güler, N. (2013). A Study on Multiple Linear Regression Analysis. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106, 234–240. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.027
Du Toit, A. (2007). Making sense through coaching. Journal of Management Development, 26 (3), 282–291. doi: http://doi.org/10.1108/02621710710732164
Sahinidis, A. G., Bouris, J. (2008). Employee perceived training effectiveness relationship to employee attitudes. Journal of European Industrial Training, 32 (1), 63–76. doi: http://doi.org/10.1108/03090590810846575
Duvall, C. K. (1999). Developing individual freedom to act: Empowerment in the knowledge organization. Participation and Empowerment: An International Journal, 7 (8), 204–212. doi: http://doi.org/10.1108/14634449910303603
Bartram, T. and Casimir, G. (2007) ‘The relationship between leadership and follower in role performance and satisfaction with the leader: The mediating effects of empowerment and trust in the leader’, Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 28 (1), 4–19. doi: http://doi.org/10.1108/01437730710718218
Chen, Y. F., Tjosvold, D. (2006). Participative Leadership by American and Chinese Managers in China: The Role of Relationships. Journal of Management Studies, 43 (8), 1727–1752. doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00657.x
Yukl, G. (2002). Leadership In Organizations (5th Edition) Gary Yukl Fag: Organisation. Management, 9 (1), 16–32.
Copyright (c) 2021 Jean Luc Kalambayi, Darlington Peter Onojaefe, Sophie Nguepi Kasse, Robertson K. Tengeh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.
Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.