Courting innovative diplomacy for health safety and security amidst the Covid-19 pandemic; the case of South Africa

Keywords: South Africa, Covid-19, Diplomacy, Innovation, Development, Multiracial, Democratic, Negotiation, Technology


Notwithstanding its level of socio-economic development, health failure is a threat to any country. Globally, the Covid-19 pandemic is believed to be the greatest threat to the existentiality of humanity since the end of World War II. The level of global interconnectivity also made it the most destructive to human existence. The accelerating growth of the pandemic in South Africa has devastated effects on its economy and cuttingly intensified prior socio-economic challenges and inadvertently, presented South Africa with an unseen and formidable enemy that does not know the differences between South African Black, Coloured, Indian or White. The study used a qualitative research approach, underpinned by the rationality for South Africa, to embrace innovative diplomacy as a means to an end for its health safety and security amidst the covid-19 pandemic. The paper argued that South Africa must innovatively engage the acceptable global mechanisms and other health security measures with focus on its commitment to the goals of its national interests, while strengthening the efficiency of its health initiatives through better-quality governance where both local and international investors are allowed to participate actively in state socio-economic activities that respond to the safety and health security of the emotionalized publics. Thus, in a globalised system of innovation, South Africa needs to see the innovation environment as a steady pipeline of its domestic ability to control the negative effect of Covid-19 on its national health security. The paper concludes that South Africa must begin to invest, modify, and localise the biotechnology industry, and thus serving as a source of employment for the teaming unemployed South Africans.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Toyin Cotties Adetiba, University of Zululand

Department of Political and International Studies


World Health Organisation (2020). Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Report – 57. Available at:

Galal, S. (2021). Coronavirus cases in Africa as of June 9, 2021, by country. Available at:

Cook, N. (2020). South Africa: Current Issues, Economy, and U.S. Relations, Congressional Research Service. Available at:

Lee, M., Lederer, E. M. (2020). Global diplomacy under the gun in the time of coronavirus. Associated Press. Available at:

Adetiba, T. C. (2021). Reordering Diplomacy Amidst the Covid-19; Africa and the rest of the world. Journal of Social Political Sciences, 2 (2), 59–114.

Ilona, K., Lister, G., Told, M., Drager, N. (Eds.) (2013). Global health diplomacy: Concepts, issues, actors, instruments, fora and cases. New York: Springer. doi:

ABC of Diplomacy. Bern: Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs (FDFA) (2008). Federal Department of Foreign Affairs. Available at:

Kalvins, D. (2011). Understanding the Essence of Modern Diplomacy. Available at:

Badie, B., Berg-Schlosser, D., Morlino, L. (Eds.) (2011). Diplomacy. International Encyclopedia of Political Science. London: Sage. Available at:

Berridge, G. R. (2010). Diplomacy Theory and Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

O'Gorman, G. (2015). The Effectiveness of Secrecy in Diplomacy. Oman: Sohar University. doi:

Berridge, G. R., Keens-Soper, M., Otte, T. G. (2001). Diplomatic Theory from Machiavelli to Kissinger. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:

Bound, K., Saunders, T., Wilsdon, J., Adams, J. (2013). China’s Absorptive State: Research, Innovation and the Prospects for China-UK Collaboration. London: Nesta.

Matambo, E. (2020). International Relations Theory after the Cold War: China, the Global South and Non-State Actors. Available at:

Griset, P. (2020). Innovation Diplomacy: A New Concept for Ancient Practices? The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 15 (3), 383–397. doi:

Leijten, J. (2017). Exploring the future of innovation diplomacy. European Journal of Futures Research, 5 (20), 1–13. doi:

The Royal Society and AAAS (2010). New frontiers in science diplomacy; Navigating the changing balance of power Science Policy Centre. Londonб 32.

Kahn, E. (2007). Innovate or Perish: Managing the Enduring Technology Company in the Global Market. New Jersey: Wiley, 336.

Breznitz, D., Murphree, M.; Breznitz, D., Zysman, J. (Eds.) (2013). China’s Run: Economic Growth, Policy, Interdependences, and Implications for Diverse Innovation Policies in a World of Fragmented Production. The Third Globalization: Can Wealthy Nations Stay Rich in the Twenty-First Century? Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 35–36. doi:

Weisbrode, K. (2017). Diplomacy in Foreign Policy. Oxford Research Encyclopedias. doi:

Labonté, R., Gagnon, M. L. (2010). Framing health and foreign policy: lessons for global health diplomacy. Globalization and Health, 6 (1), 14. doi:

Oslo Ministerial Declaration – global health: a pressing foreign policy issue of our time (2007). The Lancet, 369 (9570), 1373–1378. doi:

Chattu, V. K., Knight, A. W., Kevany, S., Sehovic, A. B. (2019). Global health diplomacy, health and human security: The ascendancy of enlightened self-interest. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 8 (107).

Kickbusch, I, (2013). Twenty- First Century Health Diplomacy. London: Imperial College, World Scientific.

National armies for global health? (2014). The Lancet, 384 (9953), 1477. doi:

Buekens, P. (2013). Medical school deans’ letter to President Obama.

Kickbusch, I., Lister, G., Told, M., Drager, N. (Eds.) (2013). Global Health Diplomacy: Concepts, Issues, Actors, Instruments, Fora and Cases. New York: Springer.

Michaud, J., Kates, J. (2012). Raising the Profile of Diplomacy in the U.S. Global Health Response: A Backgrounder on Global Health Diplomacy. Menlo Park: Kaiser Family Foundation.

Shah, R., Goosby, E., Frieden, T., Quam, L. (2012). Global Health Initiative Next Steps – A Joint Message. Washington: U.S. Global Health Initiative.

Feinsilver, J. M. (2008). Oil-for-doctors: Cuban medical diplomacy gets a little help from a Venezuelan friend. Nueva Soc. Available at:

Šehović, A. B (2017). Securing Global Health through Diplomacy: From One-Way Transfer to Multi-Directional Knowledge Exchange. Policy paper No 2, Institute for European Studies.

Berry, F. S., Berry, W. D.; Sabatier, P. A. (Ed.) (1999). Innovation and diffusion models in policy research. Theories of the policy process. Boulder: Westview Press.

Heymann, D. L., Chand, S.; Kickbusch, I., Lister ,G., Told, M., Drager, N. (Eds.) (2013). Diplomacy and Global Health Security. In Global Health Diplomacy. New York: Springer, 125–139. doi:

Katz, R., Kornblet, S., Arnold, G., Lief, E., Fisher, J. E. (2011). Defining Health Diplomacy: Changing Demands in the Era of Globalization. The Milbank Quarterly, 89 (3), 503–523. doi:

👁 56
⬇ 54
How to Cite
Adetiba, T. C. (2021). Courting innovative diplomacy for health safety and security amidst the Covid-19 pandemic; the case of South Africa. EUREKA: Social and Humanities, (6), 31-42.
Social Sciences