Courting innovative diplomacy for health safety and security amidst the Covid-19 pandemic; the case of South Africa
Notwithstanding its level of socio-economic development, health failure is a threat to any country. Globally, the Covid-19 pandemic is believed to be the greatest threat to the existentiality of humanity since the end of World War II. The level of global interconnectivity also made it the most destructive to human existence. The accelerating growth of the pandemic in South Africa has devastated effects on its economy and cuttingly intensified prior socio-economic challenges and inadvertently, presented South Africa with an unseen and formidable enemy that does not know the differences between South African Black, Coloured, Indian or White. The study used a qualitative research approach, underpinned by the rationality for South Africa, to embrace innovative diplomacy as a means to an end for its health safety and security amidst the covid-19 pandemic. The paper argued that South Africa must innovatively engage the acceptable global mechanisms and other health security measures with focus on its commitment to the goals of its national interests, while strengthening the efficiency of its health initiatives through better-quality governance where both local and international investors are allowed to participate actively in state socio-economic activities that respond to the safety and health security of the emotionalized publics. Thus, in a globalised system of innovation, South Africa needs to see the innovation environment as a steady pipeline of its domestic ability to control the negative effect of Covid-19 on its national health security. The paper concludes that South Africa must begin to invest, modify, and localise the biotechnology industry, and thus serving as a source of employment for the teaming unemployed South Africans.
World Health Organisation (2020). Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Report – 57. Available at: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200317-sitrep-57-covid-19.pdf?sfvrsn=a26922f2_4
Galal, S. (2021). Coronavirus cases in Africa as of June 9, 2021, by country. Available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1170463/coronavirus-cases-in-africa/
Cook, N. (2020). South Africa: Current Issues, Economy, and U.S. Relations, Congressional Research Service. Available at: https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R45687
Lee, M., Lederer, E. M. (2020). Global diplomacy under the gun in the time of coronavirus. Associated Press. Available at: https://apnews.com/article/understanding-the-outbreak-united-nations-virus-outbreak-international-news-united-nations-general-assembly-d61a53d19d262c3cf604cec6f4e52fad
Adetiba, T. C. (2021). Reordering Diplomacy Amidst the Covid-19; Africa and the rest of the world. Journal of Social Political Sciences, 2 (2), 59–114.
Ilona, K., Lister, G., Told, M., Drager, N. (Eds.) (2013). Global health diplomacy: Concepts, issues, actors, instruments, fora and cases. New York: Springer. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5401-4
ABC of Diplomacy. Bern: Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs (FDFA) (2008). Federal Department of Foreign Affairs. Available at: https://www.eda.admin.ch/dam/eda/en/documents/publications/GlossarezurAussenpolitik/ABC-Diplomatie_en.pdf
Kalvins, D. (2011). Understanding the Essence of Modern Diplomacy. Available at: http://www.culturaldiplomacy.org/culturaldiplomacynews/participant-papers/2011-12-cdac/Understanding-the-Essence-of-Modern-Diplomacy-Didzis-Klavins.pdf
Badie, B., Berg-Schlosser, D., Morlino, L. (Eds.) (2011). Diplomacy. International Encyclopedia of Political Science. London: Sage. Available at: https://sk.sagepub.com/reference/intlpoliticalscience/n153.xml
Berridge, G. R. (2010). Diplomacy Theory and Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
O'Gorman, G. (2015). The Effectiveness of Secrecy in Diplomacy. Oman: Sohar University. doi: http://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.25579.64800
Berridge, G. R., Keens-Soper, M., Otte, T. G. (2001). Diplomatic Theory from Machiavelli to Kissinger. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: http://doi.org/10.1057/9780230508309
Bound, K., Saunders, T., Wilsdon, J., Adams, J. (2013). China’s Absorptive State: Research, Innovation and the Prospects for China-UK Collaboration. London: Nesta.
Matambo, E. (2020). International Relations Theory after the Cold War: China, the Global South and Non-State Actors. Available at: https://www.e-ir.info/2020/04/21/international-relations-theory-after-the-cold-war-china-the-global-south-and-non-state-actors/
Griset, P. (2020). Innovation Diplomacy: A New Concept for Ancient Practices? The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 15 (3), 383–397. doi: http://doi.org/10.1163/1871191x-bja10036
Leijten, J. (2017). Exploring the future of innovation diplomacy. European Journal of Futures Research, 5 (20), 1–13. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s40309-017-0122-8
The Royal Society and AAAS (2010). New frontiers in science diplomacy; Navigating the changing balance of power Science Policy Centre. Londonб 32.
Kahn, E. (2007). Innovate or Perish: Managing the Enduring Technology Company in the Global Market. New Jersey: Wiley, 336.
Breznitz, D., Murphree, M.; Breznitz, D., Zysman, J. (Eds.) (2013). China’s Run: Economic Growth, Policy, Interdependences, and Implications for Diverse Innovation Policies in a World of Fragmented Production. The Third Globalization: Can Wealthy Nations Stay Rich in the Twenty-First Century? Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 35–36. doi: http://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199917822.003.0003
Weisbrode, K. (2017). Diplomacy in Foreign Policy. Oxford Research Encyclopedias. doi: http://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.410
Labonté, R., Gagnon, M. L. (2010). Framing health and foreign policy: lessons for global health diplomacy. Globalization and Health, 6 (1), 14. doi: http://doi.org/10.1186/1744-8603-6-14
Oslo Ministerial Declaration – global health: a pressing foreign policy issue of our time (2007). The Lancet, 369 (9570), 1373–1378. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60498-x
Chattu, V. K., Knight, A. W., Kevany, S., Sehovic, A. B. (2019). Global health diplomacy, health and human security: The ascendancy of enlightened self-interest. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 8 (107).
Kickbusch, I, (2013). Twenty- First Century Health Diplomacy. London: Imperial College, World Scientific.
National armies for global health? (2014). The Lancet, 384 (9953), 1477. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61923-1
Buekens, P. (2013). Medical school deans’ letter to President Obama. http://www.jhsph.edu/news/newsreleases/2013/Klag%20letter%20to%20President%20Obama.pdf
Kickbusch, I., Lister, G., Told, M., Drager, N. (Eds.) (2013). Global Health Diplomacy: Concepts, Issues, Actors, Instruments, Fora and Cases. New York: Springer.
Michaud, J., Kates, J. (2012). Raising the Profile of Diplomacy in the U.S. Global Health Response: A Backgrounder on Global Health Diplomacy. Menlo Park: Kaiser Family Foundation.
Shah, R., Goosby, E., Frieden, T., Quam, L. (2012). Global Health Initiative Next Steps – A Joint Message. Washington: U.S. Global Health Initiative.
Feinsilver, J. M. (2008). Oil-for-doctors: Cuban medical diplomacy gets a little help from a Venezuelan friend. Nueva Soc. Available at: http://nuso.org/media/articles/downloads/3537_2.pdf
Šehović, A. B (2017). Securing Global Health through Diplomacy: From One-Way Transfer to Multi-Directional Knowledge Exchange. Policy paper No 2, Institute for European Studies.
Berry, F. S., Berry, W. D.; Sabatier, P. A. (Ed.) (1999). Innovation and diffusion models in policy research. Theories of the policy process. Boulder: Westview Press.
Heymann, D. L., Chand, S.; Kickbusch, I., Lister ,G., Told, M., Drager, N. (Eds.) (2013). Diplomacy and Global Health Security. In Global Health Diplomacy. New York: Springer, 125–139. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5401-4_9
Katz, R., Kornblet, S., Arnold, G., Lief, E., Fisher, J. E. (2011). Defining Health Diplomacy: Changing Demands in the Era of Globalization. The Milbank Quarterly, 89 (3), 503–523. doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00637.x
Copyright (c) 2021 Toyin Cotties Adetiba
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.
Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.