Bloom’s taxonomy for the digital age student in a rural African context

Keywords: bloom taxonomy, digital technology, blooms digital taxonomy, rural learners, African education


Bloom’s Taxonomy serves as an important guide for teachers in building their student’s cognition from low to high order thinking. This taxonomy has been widely implemented in face-to-face settings worldwide. With the increased use of technology and blended and online learning on the rise, there is a need for teachers to warm up to digital learning. Teachers must be innovative in using technology to improve the quality of education and its delivery. Bloom’s Digital Taxonomy serves as an updated original Bloom’s Taxonomy for designing technology-rich instruction for quality outcomes. This qualitative study explores the use of technology and digital tools to facilitate student learning experiences and outcomes in the modern era. The secondary data collected and analyzed was gathered from existing sources of information. The study recommends that for teachers to be proficient and achieve the best outcomes and add incentives for the students, there is a need to follow the utilization of Bloom’s Digital Taxonomy and consolidate innovation, following the application will get students closer to accomplishing their learning objectives. Teachers need support to prevent forestall disdain and advancement weariness. To conclude the Bloom Digital Taxonomy is well practised in classrooms, and teachers can rest assured that the students they produce will make a difference in this world through the skills they have accumulated during their schooling years.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Morakinyo Akintolu, University of South Africa

UNESCO Chair on Open Distance Learning

College of Education

Ntandokamezi Dlamini, University of South Africa

Department of Curriculum and Instructional Studies

College of Education

Moeketsi Letseka, University of South Africa

UNESCO Chair on Open Distance Learning

College of Education


Cardone, G. (2011). Success Is Important! Huffpost. Available at:,entire%20civilizations%20cease%20to%20survive

Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Vol. I: The cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc.

Goal 4: Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all. United Nations Statistics Division Development Data and Outreach Branch (2017). New York: UNESCO. Available at:

King, E. (2011). Education is Fundamental to development and growth. Education for Global Development. Available at:

Adelore, O., Akintolu, M. (2016). Effects of Mobile Technology on Adult Learners ‘Achievement in Literacy Programmes in Ibadan. Nigeria Journal of Social Work Education, 15, 187–199.

Lightle, K. (2011). More than just the technology. Science Scope, 34 (9), 6–9.

Makoe, M. (2011). Academics going mobile: New roles for new technologies. Progressio, 33 (2), 174–188.

Akintolu, M., Uleanya, C. (2021). Ensuring Sustainable Development Goal in Rural Africa through Adult Literacy Programme: A Case Study of Technology Usage in Developing Nations. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 9 (4), 713–719. doi:

The African Child Policy Forum (2013) Definition of the Child: The International/Regional Legal Framework. Available at:

Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989). Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) Geneva: OHCHR. Available at:

UNICEF Annual Report 2020 (2020). UNICEF.

Flora, C. B., Flora, J. L., Gasteyer, S. P. (2018). Rural communities: Legacy and change. Routledge. doi:

Uleanya, C., Yu, K. (2019). Resilience: Solution to learning challenges amongst rural African undergraduates. Gender and Behaviour, 17 (2), 12921–12935.

Lalima, Dr., Lata Dangwal, K. (2017). Blended Learning: An Innovative Approach. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5 (1), 129–136. doi:

Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems. The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs, 1, 3–21.

Vygotsky, L. S., Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press, 174. doi:

Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview, Theory into Practice, 41 (4), 212–218. doi:

Sneed, O. (2016). Integrating technology with Bloom’s Taxonomy. Arizona State University Teach Online. Available at:

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 2: Do They Really Think Differently? On the Horizon, 9 (6), 1–6. doi:

Traynor, L. (2019). Exploratory study on the adoption of Financial Technology among Digital Natives and Digital Immigrants in Ireland. Dublin.

Dale, E. (1969). Audio-Visual Methods in Teaching. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York: Dryden Press, 108.

Močinić, S. N. (2012). Active teaching strategies in higher education. Metodički obzori: časopis za odgojno-obrazovnu teoriju i praksu, 7 (15), 97–105. doi:

Prithishkumar, I., Michael, S. (2014). Understanding your student: Using the VARK model. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine, 60 (2), 183–186. doi:

Government is giving every South African learner a table – here’s who is getting theirs first (2019). Business Tech.

👁 69
⬇ 74
How to Cite
Akintolu, M., Dlamini, N., & Letseka, M. (2022). Bloom’s taxonomy for the digital age student in a rural African context. EUREKA: Social and Humanities, (6), 39-47.
Social Sciences