• Yuriy Khodanych Uzhhorod National University
Keywords: mercy, social practice, charity, love for the neighbor, social exclusion


The article is devoted to the study of the evolution of socio-philosophical approaches to charity in the context of social development. The author analyzes the phenomenon of mercy through the prism of various philosophical traditions and views: Confucianism and the period of Antiquity, the Middle Ages (Blessed Augustine), German classical philosophy, Russian religious philosophy, Western philosophical thought of the twentieth century, neo-Marxism and post-Marxism. The author comes to the conclusion that at different periods of the socio-philosophical thought development, the understanding of mercy is different and receives a variety of interpretations: charity, love for neighbors, altruistic love-agape, the manifestation of the subject’s activity in the context of social practice, etc. Mercy appears as an inner motive based on compassion, sacrifice, and active participation in the needs of others. Moreover, the value of mercy permeates all religious trends, defining the role of a person in his/her interaction with all others. At the present stage of development, mercy can be considered as an element of the social ethics of responsibility (of the individual for the natural and social environment of his/her activity), and also serves as a factor in the active participation of individuals in self-organizing self-government, the formation of civil associations with the aim of implementing reforms in society.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Yuriy Khodanych, Uzhhorod National University
Department of Philosophy


Seneca L. A. On benefits. Seven books for Ebutio Liberal. Available at: http://ancientrome.ru/antlitr/t.htm?a=1328203959

Logunova, E. H. (2015). The concept of mercy in the writings of Augustine Aurelius. Modern approaches to the transformation of the endings of state regulation and management in socio-economic systems. Kursk, 222–225.

Blessed, A. (1998). About the City of God. Сh. І-ХІІІ. Vol. 3. Saint Petersburg: Aleteya, 595.

Blessed, A. (2000). Confessions. Vol. 1. Saint Petersburg: Aleteya, 469–741.

Kant, I. (1965). Fundamentals of metaphysics of morality. Vol. 4. Part 1. Moscow: Thought, 219–310.

Kant, I. (1965). Metaphysics of manners. Vol. 4. Part 2. Moscow: Thought, 107–438.

Feuerbach, L. (1995). The Essence of Christianity. Vol. 2. Moscow: Science, 5–320.

Kovalchuk, Yu. (2015). Love for God as a creative personality path in the philosophy of love of Nikolai Berdyaev. Actual problems of philosophy and sociology, 4, 79–83.

Riabinina, T. V. (1999). Dialectics of Love and Freedom in Erotic Philosophy of N. A. Berdyaev. Bulletin of the Moscow State Technical University. Moscow, 1, 29–34.

Pavenkov, O. V. (2012). Metaphysics of love-agape in religious philosophy of P. A. Florensky. Bulletin of the Russian Christian Humanitarian Academy, 13 (4), 113–120.

Schweitzer, A. (1992). Philosophy of Culture. Reverence for life. Moscow: Progress, 44–237.

Zinchenko, V. V. (2013). Neo-Marxism and the transformation-value perspective of the left ideological and political discourse in the globalized modernity. Research publications, 2, 5–37.

Zinchenko, V. V. (2016). Political ideas of post-Marxists. Political thought of XX – the beginning of the XXI centuries: methodological and doctrinal approaches. Vol. 1. Lviv: New World-2000, 280–326.

👁 355
⬇ 205
How to Cite
Khodanych, Y. (2018). EVOLUTION OF SOCIO-PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACHES TO MERCY IN THE CONTEXT OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT. EUREKA: Social and Humanities, (3), 33-38. https://doi.org/10.21303/2504-5571.2018.00653
Social Sciences