PREVENTIVE POTENTIAL OF A CITY TERRITORIAL COMMUNITY CONCERNING SOCIAL ORPHANHOOD PREVENTION

  • Larysa Kal'chenko Taras Shevchenko National University of Luhansk; Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Ukraine
Keywords: territorial community of a city, social orphanhood prevention, subjects of a community, preventive potential

Abstract

In the article the author reveals such concepts as “territorial community of a city”, “preventive potential”, “social capital”, “resourceful environment of a territorial community” in the context of social orphanhood prevention. Also in the research is presented author's interpretation of the concept of "territorial community of a city" as a complex self-manageable social system of self-organizing local communities (city quarters, areas of a big city etc.), members of which are individuals, governmental and non-governmental social organizations, non-commercial social organizations, neighborhoodhood groups and other microstructures united by common interests, goals and activity for treating own needs (everyday life, habitat, leisure time, education, communication) and localizations of possible of social risks, also solving of a problems of a territory.
Characteristic features and features of effective functioning of territorial community are defined, among which are the following: presence of individual (separated members of a community) and collective subjects (network of public and governmental organizations, social groups, neighborhoodhood unions etc.), their activity and degree of involvement in solving problems, character of interaction and permanence of connections between subjects (network of social interaction), availability of necessary resources of territorial community (as institutional, human, spiritual, time, material, administrative ones), territorial-cultural specificity of a community.
In the article the author defines subjects of a community, which have preventive potential (resource) concerning social orphanhod prevention in a territorial community of a city. The author also justifies the importance of creation of a resourceful environment of a territorial community of a city for prevention of family discomfort and neglection as well as homelessness of children, defines techniques of active involvement of community residents into solving of social problems including social orphanhood. Author also reveals forms and methods of activation of a community for social orphanhood prevention.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Larysa Kal'chenko, Taras Shevchenko National University of Luhansk; Ivan Franko National University of Lviv
Department of Post-doctoral student at Social Pedagogy; Sub-department of Special Education and Inclusion

References

Kuleba, M. (2018). Usinovlenimi mozhut' buti ne bіl'she 5 % vihovancіv іnternatіv. Available at: https://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-society/2464791-usinovlenimi-mozut-buti-ne-bilse-5-vihovanciv-internativ-kuleba.html Last accessed: 16.06.2018

Minsotspolityky: Detsentralizatsiia nadast bilshe povnovazhen hromadam u vyrishenni problem ditei iz neblahopoluchnykh simei (2017). Available at: https://www.kmu.gov.ua/ua/news/249842734 Last accessed:17.06.2018

Tyonnis, F. (2002). Obshchnost' i obshchestvo. Osnovnye ponyatiya chistoi sociologii. Saint Petersburg: Izd-vo «Vladimir Dal'», 451.

Bates, F. L., Bacon, L. (1972). The Community as a Social System. Social Forces, 50 (3), 371–379. doi: http://doi.org/10.2307/2577041

Hillery, G. A. (1955). Definitions of Community: Areas of Agreement. Rural Sociology, 20 (2), 111–123.

Batanov, O. (2008). Terytorialna hromada – pervynnyi subiekt munitsypalnoi vlady v Ukraini: poniattia ta oznaky. Visnyk Tsentralnoi vyborchoi komisii, 2, 51–57.

Jonassen, C. T. (1959). Community Typology. Community Structure and Analysis. New York, 20–21.

Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: the Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster, 505.

Shaffer, R. (1989). Community Economics. Economic Structure and Change in Smaller Communities. Iowa, Iowa State University Press. Ames, 4.

Bopp, M., Bopp, G. (1998). A Practical Guide to Building Sustainable Communities. Calgary: Alberta, 168.

Barker, R.; Barker, R. (Ed.) (1995). Community. The Social Work Dictionary. Washington: NASW Press, 68.

Scoat, P. M. (1987). The Different Drum: Community Making and Peace. Second Touchstone Edition. New York: Simon and Shuster. 337. Available at: https://www.amazon.com/Different-Drum-Community-Making-Peace/dp/067160192X Last accessed:25.07.2017

Warren, R. L. (1963). The Community in America. Chicago: Rand McNally. 418. Available at: https://www.questia.com/read/9866569/the-community-in-america Last accessed: 26.07.2017

Lelechenko, A. P., Vasylieva, O. I., Kuibida, V. S., Tkachuk, A. F. (2017). Mistseve samovriaduvannia v umovakh detsentralizatsii povnovazhen. Kyiv, 110.

Baranovska, T. M. (2016). Derzhavna polityka rozvytku terytorialnykh hromad v Ukraini. Kharkiv, 261.

Lebedynska, O., Yashchuk, L. (2015). Vzaiemodiia terytorialnoi hromady z nederzhavnymy orhanizatsiiamy shchodo profilaktyky sotsialnoho syritstva. Efektyvnist derzhavnoho upravlinnia, 42, 245–254. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/efdu_2015_42_30 Last accessed: 10.11.2015

Semyhina, T. V. (2004). Robota v hromadi: praktyka ta polityka. Kyiv: Vydavnychyi dim «KM Akademiia», 178.

Volodina, Yu. A., Matyash, N. V., Sidorina, M. S. (2012). Deinstitutionalization of orphans in an open socio-cultural space. Moscow: Pedagogical Society of Russia.

Lopatchenko, I. M. (2017). State administration of prevention of social orphanhood at the regional level. Kharkiv, 236.

Protasova, T. M. (2004). Mezhvedomstvennoe vzaimodeystvie uchrezhdeniy sotsial'noy sfery v reshenii problem sirotstva na territorii. Kemerovo, 173.

Kalchenko, L. V. (2018). Sotsialne syritstvo ta yoho preventsiia v terytorialnii hromadi mista: mizhvidomcha vzaiemodiia subiektiv hromady. Education and Pedagogical Sciences, 1 (168), 53–66.

Kyianytsia, Z. P., Petrochko, Zh. V. (2017). Sotsialna robota z vrazlyvymy simiamy ta ditmy. P. I. Suchasni oriientyry ta kliuchovi tekhnolohii. Kyiv: OBNOVA KOMPANI, 256.

Aveltseva, T. P., Kalinina, A. V., Zymivets, N. V. (2013). Mekhanizmy formuvannia ta vprovadzhennia mistsevoi sotsialnoi polityky. Robochi materialy treninhovoho kursu dlia spetsialistiv sotsialnoi sfery. Kyiv: Ukrainskyi fond «Blahopoluchchia ditei», 264.

Bezpalko, O. V., Aveltseva, T. P., Matsevko, N. I. (2006). Community Activation Technologies. Kyiv: Scientific world, 95.

Kokarev, I. (2001). Sosedskie soobshhestva: put' k budushhemu Rossii. Moscow: Prometey, 248.

Bezpalko, O. V. (2006). Orhanizatsiia sotsialno-pedahohichnoi roboty z ditmy ta moloddiu u terytorialnii hromadi: teoretyko-metodychni osnovy. Kyiv: Naukovyi svit, 363.

Minkin, Ya., Antoshchuk, Yu., Demel, G.; Soshynska Ya., Krasowska-Igras M. (Eds.) (2017). Kartuvannia hromad v Ukraini. Kyiv: UBA; Informacyjnego Fundacja Rozwoju Społeczeństwa, 111.

Inglehart, R. F., Welzel, C. (2010) Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: the human development sequence. New York: Cambridge University Press, 333. doi: http://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511790881

Pro zatverdzhennia planu zakhodiv z realizatsii Natsionalnoi stratehii profilaktyky sotsialnoho syritstva na period do 2020 roku (2013). Kabinet Ministriv Ukrainy, No. 419-r. 27.05.2013 Available at: https://www.kmu.gov.ua/ua/npas/246453881


👁 397
⬇ 311
Published
2018-11-30
How to Cite
Kal’chenko, L. (2018). PREVENTIVE POTENTIAL OF A CITY TERRITORIAL COMMUNITY CONCERNING SOCIAL ORPHANHOOD PREVENTION. EUREKA: Social and Humanities, (6), 25-33. https://doi.org/10.21303/2504-5571.2018.00798
Section
Social Sciences