• Mohammad Alhawawsha Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv.
  • Anatoly Anisimov Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
Keywords: E-government, system architecture, service delivery, system layers, internet technology, e- administration, smart government, smart technologies


Today, it is expected that governments will respond to public needs, manage public funds efficiently and transparently, and adapt to social changes. In this transitional process, public administration gains inspiration from private companies, goal-driven management, and custom. At the same time, the resistance to such a large organizational change is enormous. The huge size of the government makes it slow to change, especially when the implementation of e-government is only one of the many challenges that the government must deal with e-oriented policies. The quest to implement e-government projects is motivated by the fundamental policy goals of (i) increased effectiveness, efficiency, and information quality; and (ii) improved interaction mechanisms, and in turn better governance tools. In Jordan, e-services initiative is the heart of the e-government. Therefore, the ICT sector is best served and is able to deliver e-government services in an integrated manner, as a result since 2000, many national ICT projects have been launched to sustain and support the e-government program.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Mohammad Alhawawsha, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv.

Department of theory and technology of programming

Anatoly Anisimov, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv


Department of Mathematical Informatics


Al‐Jaghoub, S., Westrup, C. (2003). Jordan and ICT‐led development: towards a competition state? Information Technology & People, 16 (1), 93–110. doi:

Alkhaleefah, M., Alkhawaldeh, M., Venkatraman, S., Alazab, M. (2010). Towards understanding and improving e-government strategies in Jordan. Conference: World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 66.

Raguseo, E., Ferro, E. (2011). eGovernment and Organizational Changes: Towards an Extended Governance Model. Electronic Government, 418–430. doi:

Study on eGovernment and the Reduction of Administrative Burden (2014). Publications Office of the European Union. doi:

Kvale, S. (2006). Dominance Through Interviews and Dialogues. Qualitative Inquiry, 12 (3), 480–500. doi:

Nahon, K. Scholl, H (2003). Similarities and Differences of E-Commerce and e-Government: Insights from a Pilot Study. International Journal of Electronic Business.

Ndou, V. D. (2004). E - Government for Developing Countries: Opportunities and Challenges. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 18 (1), 1–24. doi:

Pathak, A., Intratat, C. (2012). Use of Semi-Structured Interviews to Investigate Teacher Perceptions of Student Collaboration. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research, 8 (1).

New-Economy Sector Study Electronic Government and Governance: Lessons for Argentina (2002). The world Bank. Washington, DC.

Visser, W., Twinomurinzi, H. (2001). E-Government and Public Service Delivery: Enabling ICT to put "People First" – A Case Study from South Africa. Available at:

👁 388
⬇ 397
How to Cite
Alhawawsha, M., & Anisimov, A. (2019). THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE E-GOVERNMENT PROJECT IN JORDAN AND ITS BENEFITS AND ADVANTAGES. Technology Transfer: Fundamental Principles and Innovative Technical Solutions, 3-5.
Computer Sciences