THE CHARACTERISTICS OF INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGREEMENTS

  • Zoltán Szira Szent István University
  • Hani Alghamdi Szent István University
Keywords: multilateral; bilateral; international law; United Nations; environmental protection

Abstract

The world faces old and new problems that are more complicated than our currently capable multilateral and national institutions. To face these challenges, international cooperation is becoming ever more important.

An international environmental agreement is a kind of treaty that is binding in international law, allowing them to accomplish an environmental goal. Bilateral environmental agreement is defined as an agreement between two countries. If the agreement is signed between three or more nations it is called a Multilateral Environmental Agreement. These agreements, mainly drawn up by the United Nations, include issues, such as environmental policies, freshwater policies, hazardous waste and material policies, aquatic environment, wildlife conservation policies, noise pollution and nuclear safety.

International agreements set a number of objectives: Informal agreements may formulate action plans for sovereign states or international institutions; they may establish or alter international organizations or bodies; and legally binding agreements may demand that sovereign states change their actions.

Least developed countries face significant challenges in terms of mitigation and adaptation, which must be resolved by successful agreements. A state government may wish to abide by an agreement but lacks the power to do so. Some climate agreements build in frameworks for promoting implementation and enforcement through technology transfer, funding and technical support. Agreements can facilitate the process of forging a common vocabulary and a mutual knowledge of an issue. States have often taken steps within their own jurisdictions which foreshadow what they are prepared to agree internationally. The balance of power is increasingly shifting, giving rise to questions about the successful functioning of foreign regimes. This current multi-polarity also deepens cleavages over the nature of agreements. The financial crisis spurred consensus on institutional reform; adapting international architecture to better represent the dynamics of contemporary power. The emerging and developing economies have concluded agreements in the environmental problem field to promote mitigation and adaptation assistance to the least developed countries.

This present paper analyzes the development, function and the problems of these agreements.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Zoltán Szira, Szent István University

Department of Economic Law and Public Administration

Hani Alghamdi, Szent István University

Doctoral School of Business and Mangamenet

References

Freestone, D. (1994). The road from Rio: international environmental law after the Earth summit. Journal of Environmental Law, 6, 193–218. doi: http://doi.org/10.1093/jel/6.2.193

Boyle, A., Freestone, D.; Boyle, A., Freestone, D. (Eds.) (1999). Introduction. International Law and Sustainable Development: Past Achievements and Future Challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: http://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198298076.003.0001

Najam, A., Christopoulou, I., Moomaw, W. R. (2004). The Emergent “System” of Global Environmental Governance. Global Environmental Politics, 4 (4), 23–35. doi: http://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2004.4.4.23

Bodansky, D. (2006). Does One Need to Be an International Lawyer to Be an International Environmental Lawyer? Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting, 100, 303–307. doi: http://doi.org/10.1017/s0272503700024514

T. Balzacq et al. (eds.), (2020). Global Diplomacy, The Sciences Po Series in International Relations and Political Economy, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28786-3_17

Morin, J., Orsini, A.(2015). Politique internationale de l’environnement. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po, 296.

Death, C. (2011). Summit theatre: exemplary governmentality and environmental diplomacy in Johannesburg and Copenhagen. Environmental Politics, 20 (1), 1–19. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2011.538161

Joyner, C. C. (2005). International Law in the 21st Century: Rules for Global Governance. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 384.

Mitchell, R. B., Andonova, L. B., Axelrod, M., Balsiger, J., Bernauer, T., Green, J. F. et. al. (2020). What We Know (and Could Know) About International Environmental Agreements. Global Environmental Politics, 20 (1), 103–121. doi: http://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00544

Mitchell, R. B. (2020). International Environmental Agreements Database Project. Available at: https://iea.uoregon.edu/ Last accessed: 16.04.2020

H. Egger, P., Jessberger, C., Larch, M. (2013). Impacts of Trade and the Environment on Clustered Multilateral Environmental Agreements. The World Economy, 36 (3), 331–348. doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12054

Kim, R. E. (2013). The emergent network structure of the multilateral environmental agreement system. Global Environmental Change, 23 (5), 980–991. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.006

Mitchell, R. B. (2003). International Environmental Agreements: A Survey of their Features, Formation, and Effects. Annual Review of Environmental Resources, 28 (1), 429–461. doi: http://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.28.050302.105603

Alesina, A., Tabellini, G. (1990). A Positive Theory of Fiscal Deficits and Government Debt. The Review of Economic Studies, 57 (3), 403–413. doi: http://doi.org/10.2307/2298021

Altamirano-Cabrera, J-C., Weikard, H-P., Haoudhi, H. (2007). In uence of political pressure groups on the stability of international climate agreements. NCCR Climate Working Paper 2007-03. University of Bern-EPFL-Paul Scherrer Institute: Bern.


Abstract views: 20
PDF Downloads: 14
Published
2020-05-18