Keywords: concrete slab, crack pattern, crack width, load, slab thickness, rigid pavement, road


Cracks that occur in rigid pavements include longitudinal cracks, transverse cracks, and corner cracks. The relatively large crack width not only spoils the aesthetics of the concrete structural elements but can also lead to structural failure. This study aims to determine the crack width of a rigid pavement concrete slab located above the subgrade which is considered a beam on an elastic foundation, so that a minimum rigid pavement concrete slab thickness can be recommended. The specimen will be observed at various thicknesses to obtain the optimum thickness. The load used is a centralized monotonous load, which represents the load of the truck vehicle. The research limitation is using a test object in the form of a concrete plate measuring 2000x600 mm which is placed on the ground with CBR=6 %. The quality of reinforced concrete slabs is fc'=40 MPa and fy=440.31 MPa. The thickness of the concrete slab varies between 100 mm, 150 mm, and 200 mm. The slab placed on the ground is then given a central loading in the form of a centralized monotonic load. The loading range starts from a load of 2–180 kN with a load interval of 2 kN. The experimental results show that the rigid pavement slab has a bending failure so that the crack pattern that occurs begins with the first crack on the underside of the slab. The crack pattern in terms of slab thickness variation has a similar pattern. The initial crack width on the slab is 0.04 mm. The thicker the slab smaller the crack width at the same load. Based on the maximum allowable crack width=0.3 mm. For loads between (80–100) kN (Road Class I, II, and III), a minimum thickness of rigid pavement slabs (70–80) mm is recommended. For loads between (130–140) kN, the minimum thickness of the rigid pavement slab (105–115) mm is recommended


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Agoes Soehardjono, Universitas Brawijaya

Department of Civil Engineering

Candra Aditya, Universitas Brawijaya

Department of Civil Engineering


Sebayang, I. R. (2013). Monitoring dan Evaluasi Perkerasan Kaku. Kementerian PU Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pusjatan. Bandung. Available at:
Soehardjono, A. (2005). Analisis dan Eksperimen Kegagalan Struktur Pelat Beton Bertulang Akibat. Beban Berulang. Seminar Nasional Material Teknik (SEMATEK), ITS Surabaya.
Rasidi, N. (2013). Crack Width Prediction in Precast Deck Slab Concrete Structure. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 3 (1), 21–27.
Hiller, J. E., Signore, J. M., Kannekanti, V., Basheer, I., Harvey, J. T. (2016). Prediction of Longitudinal Fatigue Cracking in Rigid Pavements using RadiCAL. 10th International Conference on Concrete Pavements, 561–576.
Park, R., Paulay, T. (1975). Reinforced Concrete Structures. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. doi:
Ferguson, P. M. (1980). Reinforced Concrete Fundamentals. John Wiley & Sons Inc, 237–240.
Control of Cracking in Concrete Structures (1972). ACI Journal Proceedings, 69 (12). doi:
ACI Committee 318 (1995). Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete. Farmington Hills.
ACI 318-89 (1990). Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete. Detroit, Michigan.
SNI-03-2847-2002. Tata Cara Perhitungan Struktur Beton Untuk Bangunan Gedung (2002). SNI. Bandung.
Leonhardt, F. (1977). Crack Control in Concrete Structures. TABSE Surveys, S-4/77. doi:
Base, G. D., Read, J. B., Beeby, A. W., Taylor, H. P. J. (1966). An Investigation of the Crack Control Characteristics of Various Types of Bar in Reinforced Concrete Beams. Research Report No. 18. Part 1. Cement and Concrete Association. London, 44.
Fantilli, A. P., Ferretti, D., Iori, I., Vallini, P. (1998). Flexural Deformability of Reinforced Concrete Beams. Journal of Structural Engineering, 124 (9), 1041–1049. doi:
Krishna Mohan Rao, S. V., Dilger, W. H. (1992). Control of Fexural Crack Width in Cracked Prestressed Concrete Members. ACI Structural Journal, 89 (2), 127–138. doi:
Patrick, M., Wheeler, A. (2000). Design Booklet RCB-2.1(1) Crack Control of Slabs Part 1: AS 3600 Design. One Steel Reinforcing. CCTR University of Western Sydney, 16–18.
Hughes, B. P., Cifuentes, C. V. (1988). Comparison of Early-Age Crack Width Formulas for Reinforced Concrete. ACI Structural Journal, 85 (2), 158–166. doi:
Park, R., Dean, J. A. (1984). Serviceability Limit State for Flexural Cracking of Concrete. Bridge Design and Research Seminar. Auckland-New Zealand, 101–124.
Venkateswarlu, B., Gesun, H. (1972). Cracking and Bond Slip in Reinforced Beams. ASCE Journal, 74–99.
Yang, S., Chen, J. (1988). Bond-Slip and Crack Width Calculations of Tension Members. ACI Structural Journal, 414–422. doi:
Balazs, G. L. (1993). Cracking Analysis Based on Slip and Bond Stresses. ACI Materials Journal, 90 (4), 340–348. doi:

👁 60
⬇ 46
How to Cite
Soehardjono, A., & Aditya, C. (2021). ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECT OF SLAB THICKNESS ON CRACK WIDTH IN RIGID PAVEMENT SLABS. EUREKA: Physics and Engineering, (2), 42-51.