INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF ANESTHESIA FOR LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY ON THE DYNAMICS OF STRESS HORMONES
Abstract
The aim of the study – to evaluate the influence of different variants of anesthesia, including low-opioid (LOA) and opioid-free anesthesia (OFA), on the dynamics of the stress response during laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Materials and methods: 102 patients were randomly allocated into 3 groups: 37 women assigned to receive a standard opioid-based anesthesia (OBA group), 33 women – LOA group and 32 patients OFA group.
Results: The patients of OFA group after induction and intubation of the trachea showed a significant (p<0.05) increase in cortisol level by 155.4 % and 160.9 % compared with the OBA group and LOA group. After completion of the hysterectomy, regardless of the variant of anesthesia, the level of cortisol exceeded the preoperative one (pOBA=0.116, pLOA=0.049, pOFA=0.043). Two hours after surgery with standard anesthesia (OBA group) there was a further increase in the concentration of cortisol in the blood, exceeding the initial values by 142.9 % (p=0.043). Patients in the LOA group and OFA group tended to decrease cortisolemia. The changes in adrenaline & glucose levels were somewhat similar.
Conclusion: Use of OFA is accompanied by an aggravation of the stress response at the stage of hysterectomy, which is manifested by an increase in the level of adrenaline and cortisol. The most adequate perioperative protection is inherent in low-opioid anesthesia, which is accompanied by a lower release of stress hormones during hysterectomy and in the postoperative period. Opioid-based anesthesia provides adequate intraoperative protection, but is accompanied by insufficient postoperative analgesia.
Downloads
References
Obermair, A., Armfield, N. R., Graves, N., Gebski, V., Hanna, G. B., Coleman, M. G. et. al. (2019). How to train practising gynaecologists in total laparoscopic hysterectomy: protocol for the stepped-wedge IMAGINE trial. BMJ Open, 9 (5), e027155. doi: http://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027155
Cianci, S., Gueli Alletti, S., Rumolo, V., Rosati, A., Rossitto, C., Cosentino, F. et. al. (2019). Total laparoscopic hysterectomy for enlarged uteri: factors associated with the rate of conversion to open surgery. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 39 (6), 805–810. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2019.1575342
Chambers, L. M., Carr, C., Freeman, L., Jernigan, A. M., Michener, C. M. (2019). Does surgical platform impact recurrence and survival? A study of utilization of multiport, single-port, and robotic-assisted laparoscopy in endometrial cancer surgery. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 221 (3). doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.04.038
Ovechkin, A. M., Iavorovskii, A. G. (2019). Bezopioidnaia analgeziia v khirurgii: ot teorii k praktike. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 240.
Egan, T. D. (2019). Are opioids indispensable for general anaesthesia? British journal of anaesthesia, 122 (6), e127–e135. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2019.02.018
White, P. F. (2002). The Role of Non-Opioid Analgesic Techniques in the Management of Pain After Ambulatory Surgery. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 94 (3), 577–585. doi: http://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-200203000-00019
Gupta, K., Nagappa, M., Prasad, A., Abrahamyan, L., Wong, J., Weingarten, T. N. et. al. (2018). Risk factors for opioid-induced respiratory depression in surgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analyzes. BMJ Open, 8, e024086. doi: http://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024086
Pizzi, L. T., Toner, R., Foley, K., Thomson, E., Chow, W., Kim, M. et. al. (2012). Relationship Between Potential Opioid-Related Adverse Effects and Hospital Length of Stay in Patients Receiving Opioids After Orthopedic Surgery. Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy, 32 (6), 502–514. doi: http://doi.org/10.1002/j.1875-9114.2012.01101.x
Lavand’homme, P., Estebe, J.-P. (2018). Opioid-free anesthesia. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology, 31 (5), 556–561. doi: http://doi.org/10.1097/aco.0000000000000632
Aich, A., Gupta, P., Gupta, K. (2016). Could Perioperative Opioid Use Increase the Risk of Cancer Progression and Metastases? International Anesthesiology Clinics, 54 (4), e1–e16. doi: http://doi.org/10.1097/aia.0000000000000112
Lee, J. S.-J., Hu, H. M., Edelman, A. L., Brummett, C. M., Englesbe, M. J., Waljee, J. F. et. al. (2017). New Persistent Opioid Use Among Patients With Cancer After Curative-Intent Surgery. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 35 (36), 4042–4049. doi: http://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2017.74.1363
Liu, Q., Gold, M. S. (2016). Opioid-induced Loss of Local Anesthetic Potency in the Rat Sciatic Nerve. Anesthesiology, 125 (4), 755–764. doi: http://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0000000000001239
Hakim, K. K., Wahba, W. B. (2019). Opioid-free total intravenous anesthesia improves postoperative quality of recovery after ambulatory gynecologic laparoscopy. Anesthesia: Essays and Researches, 13 (2), 199–203. doi: http://doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_74_19
Tufanogullari, B., White, P. F., Peixoto, M. P., Kianpour, D., Lacour, T., Griffin, J. et. al. (2008). Dexmedetomidine Infusion During Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: The Effect on Recovery Outcome Variables. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 106 (6), 1741–1748. doi: http://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e318172c47c
Ezhevskaia, A. A., Prusakova, Zh. B. (2012). Clinical and biochemistry aspects of the endocrine-metabolic stress-response and hemostasic disorders in high intencity spinal surgery. Fundamentalnye issledovaniia, 4, 53–56.
Kamdar, N. V., Hoftman, N., Rahman, S., Cannesson, M. (2017). Opioid-Free Analgesia in the Era of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery and the Surgical Home. Anesthesia Analgesia, 125 (4), 1089–1091. doi: http://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000002122
Boysen, P. G., Pappas, M. M., Evans, B. (2018). An Evidence-Based Opioid-Free Anesthetic Technique to Manage Perioperative and Periprocedural Pain. Ochsner Journal, 18 (2), 121–125. doi: http://doi.org/10.31486/toj.17.0072
Beloeil, H. (2019). Opioid-free anesthesia. Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology, 33 (3), 353–360. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2019.09.002
Gupta, S., Mohta, A., Gottumukkala, V. (2020). Opioid-free anesthesia – caution for a one-size-fits-all approach. Perioperative Medicine, 9 (1). doi: http://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-020-00147-3
Khalimonchyk, V., Klygunenko, O. (2019). Influence of components of anesthesia on dynamics of stress markers in gynecological laparoscopic surgery. Medical Perspectives, 24 (3), 33–39. doi: http://doi.org/10.26641/2307-0404.2019.3.181876
Halabi, W. J., Jafari, M. D., Nguyen, V. Q., Carmichael, J. C., Mills, S., Stamos, M. J., Pigazzi, A. (2013). A Nationwide Analysis of the Use and Outcomes of Epidural Analgesia in Open Colorectal Surgery. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 17 (6), 1130–1137. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2195-4
Nau, C. (2013). From preemptive to preventive analgesia. Anaesthesist, 62 (10), 787–788. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-013-2250-2
Venkata Ramudu R. et al. (2015). Relationship between surgical stress and serum cortisol level: a comparative study among elective and emergencive surgery. Indo American Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 5 (12), 3759–3764.
Shaikh, S., Verma, H., Yadav, N., Jauhari, M., Bullangowda, J. (2012). Applications of Steroid in Clinical Practice: A Review. ISRN Anesthesiology, 2012, 1–11. doi: http://doi.org/10.5402/2012/985495
Velickovic, I., Yan, J., Grass, J. A. (2002). Modifying the neuroendocrine stress response. Seminars in Anesthesia, Perioperative Medicine and Pain, 21 (1), 16–25. doi: http://doi.org/10.1053/sane.2002.30675
Radvansky, B. M., Shah, K., Parikh, A., Sifonios, A. N., Le, V., Eloy, J. D. (2015). Role of Ketamine in Acute Postoperative Pain Management: A Narrative Review. BioMed Research International, 2015, 1–10. doi: http://doi.org/10.1155/2015/749837
Doger, C., Aydin, G., Aksoy, M., Emre, C., Deveci, A., Bozkurt, M. et. al. (2014). The effect of anesthesia type on stress hormone response: Comparison of general versus epidural anesthesia. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice, 17 (4), 523–527. doi: http://doi.org/10.4103/1119-3077.134058
Copyright (c) 2021 Ruslan Tkachenko, Stanislav Zaychenko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.
Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.