Screening and monitoring of watermelon source material by components of the vegetation period in the conditions of the forest-steppe of Ukraine
Abstract
Relevant in the selection of each crop, including watermelon is a comprehensive study of the source material to identify sources of valuable traits and include them in the selection process in order to expand the genetic diversity of the culture. According to the results of research, to create a new source material for heterosis selection of watermelon, screening and monitoring of the vegetation period duration (number of days from germination to ripening) and its components 118 (101 varieties, 17 hybrids) genotypes of watermelon in the forest-steppe of Ukraine have been conducted. Research methods are generally accepted: field experiment, observation, accounting, analysis, statistical. According to the results of determining the duration of the components of the vegetation period, the samples were divided into five groups of ripeness: early (65–80 days) – 80 (68 %), medium-early (81–85 days) – 14 (12 %), medium (86–95 days) – 18 (15 %), medium-late (96–105 days) – 4 (3 %) and late (106 days) – 2 (2 %). Variety-samples, selected by morphological and economically valuable characteristics, belong mainly (80 %) to early and medium-early. Only 6 % of genotypes belong to the medium-late and late-ripening groups. 52 samples with the smallest separate interphase periods were isolated. According to the results of the research, 8 sources with the high early ripeness were identified, the vegetation period of which was 66–70 days: Yellow early 108105 (66 days), Karapuz 108109, Surprise 108121 (67 days), Gift of the sun 108109, Lezheboka honey 108116, Thailand №1 108153 ( 69 days), Sweet Diamond 107874, Northern Lights 108127 (70 days). Sources are involved in the selection process
Downloads
References
Lymar, A. O. et. al. (2001). Metodyka selektsiinoho protsesu ta provedennia polovykh doslidiv z bashtannymy kulturamy. Kyiv: Ahrarna nauka, 132.
Orliuk, A. P., Didenko, V. P. (2009). Teoretychni i praktychni aspekty selektsii bashtannykh kultur. Kherson: Ailant, 320.
Sokolov, S. D. (2003). Osnovy gibridnogo semenovodstva bakhchevykh kultur. Bakhchevodstvo v Rossii (problemy i puti resheniia). Rossiiskii arbuz. Astrakhan, 20–26.
Lymar, A. O. (Ed.) (2000). Bakhchevye kultury. Kyiv: Agrarna nauka, 330.
Korniienko, S. I., Serhiienko, O. V., Krutko, R. V. (2016). Metodychni pidkhodu doboru ta stvorennia vykhidnoho materialu u heterozysnii selektsii kavuna. Vinnytsia: TOV «Nilan-LTD», 106.
Vavilov, N. I. (1960). Bakhchevye kultury. Izbrannye trudy, 2, 292–329.
FAOSTAT /Food and Agriculture organization of the United Nations. Available at: http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/DesktopDefault.aspx?PageID=567#ancor Last accessed: 03.02.2019
Yarovyi, H. I. et. al. (2006). Sorty kavuna ta ahrotekhnolohiia vyroshchuvannia nasinnia. Kharkiv, 16.
Serhiienko, O. V., Loboda, O. M. (2011). Novyi sortyment kavuna adaptovanyi do pivnichnoi zony bashtannytstva. Aktualni problemy pidvyshchennia efektyvnosti vyrobnytstva ovochevoi produktsii ta nasinnia. Kharkiv, 80–81.
Horova, T. K., Yakovenko, K. I. (Eds.) (2001). Suchasni metody selektsii ovochevykh i bashtannykh kultur. Kharkiv: Osnova, 432.
Serhiienko, O. V., Loboda, O. M. (2010). Novyi kholodostiikyi sort kavuna Maks Plius. Ovochivnytstvo i bashtannytstvo, 56, 306–311.
Serhiienko, O. V. (2010). Novyi rannostyhlyi sort kavuna Sharm. Ovochivnytstvo i bashtannytstvo, 57, 67–71.
Serhiienko, O. V., Loboda, O. M. (2012). Novyi rannostyhlyi sort kavuna Tselebnyi. Visnyk KhNAU. Ser. „Tekhnichni nauky. Silskohospodarski nauky. Ekonomichni nauky”, 12, 208–210.
Serhiienko, O. V. (2016). Novyi heterozysnyi hibryd kavuna Kazka F1. Ovochivnytstvo i bashtannytstvo, 62, 281–287.
Serhiienko, O. V., Mohylna, O. M., Linnik, Z. P., Lukianchykova, O. A. (2020). Metodychni pidkhody z vykorystannia identyfikovanoho za morfolohichnymy henamy liniinoho materialu u heterozysnii selektsii kavuna. Kharkiv, 100.
Derzhavnyi reiestr sortiv roslyn, prydatnykh do poshyrennia v Ukraini (vytiah) (2021). Derzhavna sluzhba z okhorony prav na sorty roslyn Ukrainy. Kyiv, 348–352.
Lymar, V. A., Shashkova, N. I., Shablia, O. S., Kholodniak, O. H. (2020). Ways of innovative development of the melon growing industryin the South Ukraine. Scientific Bulletin of Kherson State University. Series Economic Sciences, 38, 18–24. doi: http://doi.org/10.32999/ksu2307-8030/2020-38-3
Shablia, O. S. (2012). Metodychni pidkhody shchodo vyznachennia konkurentospromozhnosti vitchyznianykh sortiv bashtannykh kultur. Tavriiskyi naukovyi visnyk, 80, 156–161.
Elatskov, Iu. A. (2012). Rasshirenie geneticheskogo raznoobraziia kollektsii arbuza dlia razlichnykh napravlenii selektsii. Trudy po prikladnoi. botanike, genetike i selektsii, 170, 236–240.
Brytik, O. A. (2015). Rezultaty hibrydnoi selektsii kavuna stolovoho. Tavriiskyi naukovyi visnyk, 91, 21–24.
Nunhems Ukraina. Available at: http://www.nunhems.ua/www/nunhemsinternet.nsf/id/UA_UK_Watermelon-WMW Last accessed: 04.02.2019
Svitovyi rynok kavuna ta dyni (2019). Available at: https://www.profihort.com/2019/06/svitovij-rinok-kavuna-ta-dini-2/ Last accessed: 04.03.2019
Sergienko, O. V. (2020). Izmenchivost i uroven proiavleniia selektsionnykh priznakov sortov i gibridov F1 arbuza. Sovremennoe sostoianie i perspektivy razvitiia otraslei plodovodstva i ovoschevodstva. Almalibak, 381–385.
Sergienko, O. V., Linnik, Z. P., Lukianchikova, O. A. (2021). Novii gibrid arbuza Met F1. Strategiia i prioritety razvitiia zemledeliia i selektsii v Belarusi. Dostizheniia nauki – proizvodstvu. Minsk, 100.
Sergienko, O. V. (2006). Kollektsionnye obraztsy arbuza kak istochniki khoziaistvenno-tsennykh priznakov i svoistv. Innovatsionnye tekhnologi v selektsii i semenovodstve selskokhoziaistvennykh kultur. Moscow: VNIISSOK, 2, 256–258.
Tekhanovich, G. A., Elatskova, A. G., Elatskova, Y. A. (2019). Genetic sources for breeding bushy and short-vine watermelon cultivars. Proceedings on Applied Botany, Genetics and Breeding, 180 (2), 89–94. doi: http://doi.org/10.30901/2227-8834-2019-2-89-94
Varivoda, E. A., Koleboshina, Т. G., Kornilova, М. S. (2020). Collection accessions and source material as a determining factor for producing new melon cultivars. Proceedings on Applied Botany, Genetics and Breeding, 181 (2), 23–27. doi: http://doi.org/10.30901/2227-8834-2020-2-23-27
Didenko, V. P., Brytik, O. A. (2002). Stvorennia heterozysnykh hibrydnykh populiatsii F1 kavuna z vykorystanniam materynskykh linii monotsiinoho typu. Kherson, 11.
Kuzmychov, V. P. (1965). Grunty Kharkivshchyny i pidvyshchennia yikh rodiuchosti. Kharkiv: Prapor, 100.
Dospekhov, B. A. (1985). Metodika polevogo opyta. Moscow: Kolos, 351.
Bondarenko, H. L., Yakovenko, K. I. (Eds.) (2001). Metodyka doslidnoi spravy v ovochivnytstvi i bashtannytstvi. Kharkiv: Osnova, 369.
DSTU 5045:2008. Kavun, dynia, harbuz. Tekhnolohiia vyroshchuvannia. Zahalni vymohy. [Chynnyi vid 2009-07-01] (2009). Kyiv: Derzhspozhyvstandart Ukrainy, 11.
Fursa, T. B., Malinina, M. I., Artiugina, Z. D. et. al. (1985). Rukovodstvo po aprobatsii bakhchevykh kultur. Moscow: Agropromizdat, 181.
Fursa, T. B., Korneichuk, V. A., Rakochi, L. (1989). Shirokii unifitsirovannii klassifikator SEV roda Sitrullus Schrad. Leningrad, 29.
Metodyka provedennia ekspertyzy sortiv kavuna zvychainoho (Citrullus lanatus (Thunb) Matsum. et Nakai) na vidminnist, odnoridnist i stabilnist (2015). Kyiv, 27.
Armstrong, R. A. (2014). When to use the Bonferroni correction. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 34 (5), 502–508. doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/opo.12131
Tukey, J. W. (1949). Comparing Individual Means in the Analysis of Variance. Biometrics, 5 (2), 99–114. doi: http://doi.org/10.2307/3001913
Copyright (c) 2021 Zahar Linnik, Oksana Sergienko, Tetiana Harbovska
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.
Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.
