THE ANALYSIS OF EXISTING EXPERIENCE FOR THE ETHNOBOTANICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM
Ethnobotanical researches reflect the conventional learning of a region. Over the previous decade, medical plants which used for healing indigenous people has become a significant notion among the people and impacted improvement of scientific and ethnobotanical knowledge and investigations of eliminating health problems. A public database has been based on data assembled from various verifiable sources, including journals, travel records, and treatises on therapeutic plants, composed by explorers, botanists, doctors, researchers who went to the nations during the most recent three centuries. In addition, ethnobotanical data depicted in chronicled natural accumulations and in Ancient and Medieval writings from the inquired district have been incorporated into the database. The databases have to be sufficiently adaptable to illustrate a valuable tool for analysts who need to store and analyze present and past ethnobotanical data from the researched location. The ethnobotanical researches are improved in Azerbaijan day by day. The database is used for informing people about some national plants which are growing in the different region of Azerbaijan. The ethnobotanical databases from different countries are analyzed in this article.
There are used some special methods for comparing the differences among these databases as data mining and text mining. As a first step the suitable databases are gathered for our investigation, then are defined the best information systems that are used in many countries’ biologists and scientists and the end is observed advantages and disadvantages of all existing ethnobotanical databases which we researched. The features of information systems are evaluated. The results demonstrated each of databases has its very own quality, but none has turned a standard form for universal research. The reason is very basic: none of these databases enable specialists to include their own information. There is also illustrated sample structure, main tables and key components of the ethnobotanical database.
The obtained results, while a few ethnobotanical databases existing, none are satisfactory answers for worldwide work, and none enable analysts to include their very own information. There is a need brought together all essential properties of existing databases, and creating a free database that encourages ethnobotanical research. Due to the rise and quick improvement in the field of data advances, it has now turned out to be conceivable to digitize, oversee and make ethnobotanical information accessible to a more extensive gathering of people.
Ahmed, H. M. (2016). Ethnopharmacobotanical study on the medicinal plants used by herbalists in Sulaymaniyah Province, Kurdistan, Iraq. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 12 (1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-016-0081-3
Baydoun, S., Chalak, L., Dalleh, H., Arnold, N. (2015). Ethnopharmacological survey of medicinal plants used in traditional medicine by the communities of Mount Hermon, Lebanon. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 173, 139–156. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2015.06.052
WHO Traditional Medicine Strategy: 2014–2023 (2013). Geneva: World Health Organization, 76.
Sarkar, I. N. (2007). Biodiversity informatics: organizing and linking information across the spectrum of life. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 8 (5), 347–357. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbm037
Mehdiyeva, N. P., Guliyev, I. S., Alizade, V. M., Alirzayeva, E. H., Bussmann, R. W. (2017). Ethnobotany of the Caucasus – Azerbaijan. Ethnobotany of the Caucasus, 37–46. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49412-8_16
Maryo, M., Nemomissa. S., Bekele, T. (2015). An ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants of the Kembatta ethnic group in Enset-based agricultural landscape of Kembatta Tembaro (KT) Zone, Southern Ethiopia. Asian Journal of Plant Science and Research, 5 (7), 42–61.
Buenz, E., Schnepple, D., Bauer, B., Elkin, P., Riddle, J., Motley, T. (2004). Techniques: Bioprospecting historical herbal texts by hunting for new leads in old tomes. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, 25 (9), 494–498. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2004.07.003
Buneman, P. (2005). What the Web Has Done for Scientific Data – and What It Hasn’t. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/11563952_1
Shinde, P., Govilkar, S. (2015). A Systematic study of Text Mining Techniques. International Journal on Natural Language Computing, 4 (4), 54–62. doi: https://doi.org/10.5121/ijnlc.2015.4405
Haripriya, P., Porkodi, R. (2016). A Survey Paper on Data mining Techniques and Challenges in Distributed DICOM. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, 5 (3), 741–747.
International Ethnobotany Database. Available at: https://olorien.org/ebDB
Prelude Medicinal Plants Database. Available at: https://www.africamuseum.be/research/collections_libraries/biology/prelude
FRLHT Encyclopedia of Indian Medicinal Plants. Available at: http://www.frlht.org/newenvis/indian-medicinalplants-database.php
TradiMed. Available at: http://www.tradimed.com/
Dr. Duke’s Phytochemical and Ethnobotanical Databases. Available at: https://phytochem.nal.usda.gov/phytochem/search
A Modern Herbal Database. Available at: http://www.botanical.com/botanical/mgmh/mgmh.html
NAPRALERT. Available at: https://napralert.org/
Native American Ethnobotany. Available at: http://naeb.brit.org/
Mehtiyeva, N. (2013). Importance database of medicinal plants for plant biodiversity conservation in Azerbaijan. International conference, Environmental changes conservation of plant diversity.
Copyright (c) 2019 Laman Faig Hamidova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.
Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.