Analysis of functional potential of communication technologies in modern educational practices
Abstract
The object of research is communication technologies. It is devoted to the analysis of their functional potential in educational practices. On the basis of the author's integrated methodology, communication, its structure, varieties, functional range and constructive potential are considered. The role of dialogue and discourse as a form of reflection is highlighted. It turns out the importance of hermeneutics for educational activities. It is necessary that taking into account the peculiarities of modern communication is of fundamental importance for increasing the effectiveness of educational and educational practices.
Investigated problem. The communicative philosophy proposes landmarks different from the classical philosophy of consciousness. They provide for the recognition of the phenomenon of communication as fundamental to human existence. Here communication is seen as the last foundation of consciousness, cognition and social life. This question was developed by a number of researchers earlier, but the problem remains relevant. This is due to the need to substantiate the universal foundations of human understanding. Also, the aim of research is to find new ways to harmonize relations between people.
Main scientific results. The scientific novelty of the research lies in the creation of an integrated post-non-classical model of modern communication. The features of the complex of modern communication technologies are investigated. On the basis of the author's methodological program, the functional potential of modern communication technologies in educational and upbringing practices was discovered.
The scope of practical application of the research results. The proposed methodological program is used in the development of strategies for the education of a communicative culture, in the teaching of special courses in modern communicative philosophy, pedagogy, sociology of education and culture. The research results were introduced into the educational process of the H. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University, Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University, Kharkіv College of Trade and Economіcs of Kyіv Natіonal Unіversіty of Trade and Economіcs.
An innovative analysis of the functional potential of communicative practices, together with the developed recommendations, is appropriate to apply in modern education, which is aimed at the formation of a strong and courageous personality, capable of building a successful life strategy.
Downloads
References
Luhmann, N. (1984). Soziale Systeme. Grundriß einer allgemeiner Theorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 675.
Andrushchenko, V., Peredborska, I. (Eds.) (2009). Filosofiia osvity. Kyiv: Vyd-vo NPU imeni M. P. Drahomanova, 329.
Tryniak, M. V. (2011). Interkulturna komunikatsiia v osviti: tendentsiia rozghortannia u suchasnykh sotsiokulturnykh kontekstakh. Kharkiv.
Kultaieva, M. D. (2006). Kontury yevropeiskoho hromadianskoho suspilstva i ukrainska realnist. Tsinnosti hromadianskoho suspilstva i moralnyi vybir: ukrainskyi dosvid. Kyiv: ETNA-1, 143–151.
Kosharnyi, S. O. (1992). Bilia dzherel filosofskoi hermenevtyky (V.Diltei i E. Husserl). Kyiv. Naukova dumka, 124.
Geertz, C. (1995). Dichte Beschreibung. Beiträge zum Verstehen kultureller Systeme. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 320.
Hofron, A. (2006). Filosofsko-komunikatyvni aspekty osvity. Filosofiia osvity, 1 (3), 43–53.
Hofe, O. (2007). Demokratiia v epokhu hlobalizatsii. Kyiv: PPS-2002, 435.
Valdenfels, B. (2004). Topohrafiia Chuzhoho: studii z fenomenolohii Chuzhoho. Kyiv: PPS, 206.
Cherepanova, S. (2020). Filosofiia osvity. Komunikatyvno-ekskursiinyi praktykum. Dialohy studentiv pro mystetstvo ta osvitu. Lviv – Oksford. Lviv: Rastr-7, 37.
Spranger, E., Braeuer, H. G., Flitner, A. (1969). Das Gesetz der ungewollten Nebenwirkungen in der Erziehung. Geist der Erziehung. Heidelberg: Quell und Maeyer, 348–405.
Apel, K.-O. (1998). Transtsendentalno-germenevticheskoe poniatie iazyka. Ot Ia k Drugomu: problemy sotsialnoi ontologii v postklassicheskoi filosofii. Minsk: Propilei, 27–36.
Apel, K.-O., Yermolenko, A. M. (1999). Spriamuvannia anhlo-amerykanskoho „komunitaryzmu” u svitli dyskursyvnoi etyky. Komunikatyvna praktychna filosofiia. Kyiv: Libra, 372–394.
Bystrytskyi, Ye., Zymovets, R., Proleiev, S. (2020). Komunikatsiia i kultura v hlobalnomu sviti. Kyiv: Dukh i litera, 416.
Habermas, J.; Habermas, J., Luhmann, N. (Eds.) (1971). Vorbereitende Bemerkungen zu einer Theorie der kommunikativer Kompetenz. Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialthechnologie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 98–156.
Yermolenko, A. M. (1999). Komunikatyvna praktychna filosofiia. Kyiv: Libra, 488.
Luhmann, N. (1998). Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Zweiter Teilband. Frankfurt am Main, 1164.
Sytnychenko, L. A. (1996). Pershodzherela komunikatyvnoi filosofii. Kyiv: Lybid, 176.
Freire, P. (2004). Pedahohika svobody. Etyka, demokratiia i hromadianska muzhnist. Kyiv: KM Akademiia, 124.
Gadamer, G.-G.; Bessonov, B. N. (Ed.) (1988). Istina i metod. Osnovy filosofskoi germenevtiki. Moscow: Progress, 704.
Kultaieva, M. D. (2002). Martin Haidehher u spohadakh koleh ta uchniv. U Martin Haidehher ochyma suchasnykiv. Kyiv: Stylos, 3–23.
Gumboldt, V. fon. (1985). Iazyk i filosofiia kultury. Moscow: Progress, 448.
Shleiermakher, F.; Guchinskaia, N. O. (Ed.) (2004). Germenevtika. Saint Petersburg: «Evropeiskii Dom», 242.
Bakhtin, M. M. (2000). Avtor i geroi: K filosofskim osnovam gumanitarnykh nauk. Saint Petersburg: Azbuka, 336.
Bibler, V. S. (1989). Kultura. Dialog kultur. Voprosy filosofii, 6, 31–42.
Buber, M. (1995). Ia i ty. Moscow: Respublika, 464.
Hösle, V. (2006). Der philosophische Dialog Eine Poetik und Hermeneutik. München: Verlag C. H. Beck, 494.
Levinas, E. (1999). Totalnost i beskonechnoe: esse o vneshnosti. Voprosy filosofii, 2, 54–67.
Yaspers, K.; Sytnychenko L. A. (1996). Komunikatsiia. Pershodzherela komunikatyvnoi filosofii. Kyiv: Lybid, 132–148.
Honcharenko, O. (2018). Filosofiia osvity u Lvivsko-Varshavskii shkoli. Kamianets-Podilskyi: Drukarnia «Ruta», 476.
Copyright (c) 2021 Maya Trynyak, Viktoriia Tykhonovych, Natalііa Skіnder, Іryna Torіanіk, Tetiana Teterina
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.
Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.
