Reflecting the theatralization of life in the prospects of transhumanism
The crisis state of society at the beginning of the 21st century is increasingly described as chaos. At the same time, the desire of people to theatricalization of many types of their activities remains unchanged. This gives grounds to consider the theatricality of being as a sociocultural constant, immanently inherent in humanity. The fact that it persists even during periods of cardinal changes, social transformations, civilizational shifts, breaking cultural stereotypes, destruction of traditional institutions and discreditation of established ideals can be explained by the fact that theatricalization of life allows people to cope with sociopsychological discomfort and existential fears, caused by the feeling of total chaos. At the same time, people are faced with the problem of increasingly complex self-identification, which is largely facilitated by the ideas of transhumanism, which actively shatter the already weak notions of what a human being is. One of the approaches to solving this scientific problem is proposed to consider human activity in the context of theatricality of being.
The purpose of the article is to comprehend the practice of theatricalization of various types of human activity in the context of the ideas of transhumanism. The methodological strategy of this research is based on the concept of theatricality of socio-communicative manifestations of culture. Analysis of the theoretical material showed that in the conditions of transhumanism, the development of criteria that make it possible to determine whether a human is still a human or has already turned into something else becomes an urgent task. One of these markers is proposed to consider the desire of a human to theatricalization of various types of their activities. Being one of the sociocultural constants immanently inherent in humanity, theatricality will be present in people's lives as long as they remain human, as long as they feel the need to articulate their social communication.
Budanov, V. G., Aseeva, I. A. (2013). Social Chaos and Problems of Management of Future During an Era of Changes. World Applied Sciences Journal, 25 (9), 13831389.
Pavlov, A. P., Pavlov, P. A. (2015). Ontology of social chaos. Gramota, 8 (58), 136–139.
Manoylo, A. V. (2014). Role of controlled chaos strategies in the formation of the new global order. Law and Politics, 5 (173), 638651. doi: http://doi.org/10.7256/1811-9018.2014.5.11816
Prokopovich, L. V. (2019). Theatricality in socio-communicative manifestations of culture: a socio-philosophical study. Odesa: Ekolohiia, 336.
Bostrom, N. (2005). A History of Transhumanist Though. Journal of Evolution and Technology, 14 (1).
Fereidoun, M. (1989). Are You a Transhuman? Monitoring and Stimulating Your Personal Rate of Growth in a Rapidly Changing World. FM-2030. Warner Boors, 227.
Vladimirov, D. (2020). Mikhail Kovalchuk: «Kolonizatsiya zamenilas tekhnologicheskim poraboscheniem». Argumenty i fakty. Available at: https://aif.ru/society/opinion/mihail_kovalchuk_kolonizaciya_zamenilas_tehnologicheskim_poraboshcheniem
Butler, J. (1998) Hass spricht: Zur Politik des Performativen. Berlin: Berlin Verlag, 159.
Domanska, E. (2012). Istoriia ta suchasna humanitarystyka: doslidzhennia z teorii znannia pro mynule. Kyiv: Nika-Tsentr, 264.
Shechner, R. (1977). Essays on Performance Theory (19701976). New York: Drama Book Specialists, 212.
Khabermas, Yu. (1982). Ponyatie individualnosti. Voprosy filosofii, 2, 35–40.
Kheyzinga, Y. (1997). Homo Ludens; Stati po istorii kultury. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya, 416.
Shiller, F. (2016). Pisma ob esteticheskom vospitanii cheloveka. Ripol Klassik, 242. Available at: https://www.yakaboo.ua/pis-ma-ob-jesteticheskom-vospitanii-cheloveka.html#tab-attributes
Gesse, G. (1969). Igra v biser. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya literatura. Available at: http://lib.ru/GESSE/biser.txt
Delez, ZH. (2004). Peregovory. 1972–1990. Saint Petersburg: Nauka, 235.
Debord Guy. La societé du spectacle. Available at: http://sami.is.free.fr/Oeuvres/debord_societe_spectacle_1.html
Goffman, E. (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. University of Edinburg Social Sciences Research Center, 162.
Lipovetsky, M. (2010) Charms of the Cynical Reason: Tricksters in Soviet and Post-Soviet Culture (Cultural Revolutions: Russia in the Twentieth Century). Boston: Academic Studies Press, 300. doi: http://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt21h4wjt
Lotman, Yu. M. (1992). Teatr i teatralnost v stroe kultury nachala XIX veka. Izbrannye stati. Vol. 1. Tallinn: Aleksandra, 269–286.
Bakanurskiy, A. G. (2013). Zhizn, igra, teatralnost: issledovanie v trekh aktakh s prologom i epilogom. Kherson: Grin D.S., 318.
Chmil, H. P., Korablova, N. S. (2013). Vizualizatsiia realnoho v suchasnomu kulturnomu prostori. Kyiv: Instytut kulturolohii NAMU, 256.
Olyanich, A. V. (2015). Teatralnost kak kategoriya politicheskogo diskursa. Diskurs-Pi, 2, 176–178.
Prokopovych, L. (2019). Socio-philosophical foundations of theatricalization of the political sphere. Scientific and Theoretical Almanac Grani, 22 (2), 48–58. doi: http://doi.org/10.15421/171922
Ivanova, S., Dimitrov, L., Ivanov, V., Prokopovych, L. (2021). Using role-playing game for professional skills formation of prospective teachers. society. integration. education. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, 1, 195–206. doi: http://doi.org/10.17770/sie2021vol1.6180
Prokopovich, L. V. (2019). Theatricality of sportsin the socio-philosophical understanding. Scientific Journal “Virtus”, 35, 4044.
Korotkova, M. V. (2018). Teatr i muzey: ispolzovanie priemov teatralizatsii v kulturno-obrazovatelnoy deyatelnosti muzeya. Nauka i shkola, 4, 128–132.
Prokopovych, L. (2019). Human in the new, biotechnocybernetic, “theater” of being. Scientific and Theoretical Almanac Grani, 22 (7), 21–29.
Prokopovych, L. V. (2018). Doslidzhennia henezysu teatru ta teatralizatsii zhyttia yak fenomeniv yevropeiskoi kultury. European philosophical and historical discourse, 4 (3), 112–117.
Melik-Gaykazyan, I. V. (2013). Memory turn: proyavlennaya bioetikoy brennost intellektualnykh traditsiy. Idei i idealy, 1 (15), 49–63.
Oslon, A. (2006). Obraz buduschego v sotsialnoy realnosti. Sotsialnaya realnost. Zhurnal sotsiologicheskikh nablyudeniy i soobscheniy, 11, 4–10.
Copyright (c) 2021 Lada Prokopovych
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.
Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.