Rethinking the development of social policy in front of the millennium goals. changing programs and speeches as alternatives to the official message
Abstract
This article focuses on Mexicans, socially perceived as poor, and the impact of social policy in force in the second decade of the 21st century, focused on improving the living conditions of the population, living in poverty and facing the national democratic process, which represents the alternative of change to the national conditions in Mexico. A country with social inequalities, where the lack of guaranteeing equal living conditions through institutional frameworks that guarantee opportunities and access to common satisfiers is evident. Therefore, in the midst of a democratization process, the State seeks to address the levels of precariousness. In the midst of the recognition of the basic needs to be met among those who are reviewing the renewed social policy of the 21st century, the need to strengthen the living conditions of the excluded is prioritized and in its consolidation process it would guarantee attention to poverty through institutional channels. This is the case of the social development law, which deals with a problem of productive order from a State vision. An analysis is carried out that seeks to identify the relationship between the effectiveness of current actions to combat the lack of attention to basic needs and the institutionalized discourse, which, according to the social research approach, strengthens the interest in conducting studies on social precariousness as a group characteristic; fueled by the political discourse, exalted by the government in turn of the poor first. In this case, it is the message that strengthens the need to analyze the way, in which poverty is measured based on the recognition of poverty lines, as an instrument that allows knowing the number of people in that condition, according to the levels of dissatisfaction of food needs and due to the low level of economic income (inability to consume a basic set of food goods) for rural and urban environments. Therefore, it seeks to measure the lack of food needs, without considering the causes of inability to generate minimum income levels to consume basic foods.
Downloads
References
World Economic Forum “The Global Competitiveness Report 2009–2010” (2009). Suiza. Available at: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2009-10.pdf
Comité Técnico para la Medición de la Pobreza (CTMP). (2002). Medición de la pobreza: variantes metodológicas y estimación preliminar. México- Sedesol (documentos de investigación, 1)
CONEVAL (2019). Consejo Nacional de Evaluación de la Política de Desarrollo Social. Medición y análisis de la pobreza en México. Memorias del CONEVAL 2006–2018. Ciudad de México. https://www.coneval.org.mx/InformesPublicaciones/Documents/Memorias/Medicion-y-analisis-de-la-pobreza.pdf
Consejo Nacional de Evaluación de la Política de Desarrollo Social (CONEVAL) (2007). Índice de Rezago Social 2005.
Consejo Nacional de Evaluación de la Política de Desarrollo Social (CONEVAL) (2016). Informe de pobreza en México. México.
Consejo Nacional de Evaluación de la Política de Desarrollo Social (CONEVAL) (2018). Metodología para la medición de la pobreza en los municipios de México. México.
Consejo Nacional de Evaluación de la Política Social (CONEVAL) (2012) Programas y Acciones Federales de Desarrollo Social, Coneval. México.
De Humboldt, A. (2002). Ensayo político sobre el reino de la Nueva España, México, Porrúa. Colección Sepan Cuántos, 39 (1811), 68–69.
Foucault, M. (1983). El discurso del poder, México, Folios Gorgias, Madrid, Vol. II. Biblioteca Clásica de Gredos.
Hannan, S. A., Aguirre, J. P. C., Bartolini, D. (2021). IMF Working Paper. Social Spending in Mexico: Needs, Priorities and Reforms. Western Hemisphere Department. Available at: https://www.imf.org/-/media/Files/Publications/WP/2021/English/wpiea2021244-print-pdf.ashx
Resultados de la encuesta nacional de ocupación y empleo. nueva edición (enoen)1cifras durante el primertrimestre de 2021 INEGI (2021). Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. Comunicado de prensa Núm. 280/21. Available at: https://www.inegi.org.mx/contenidos/saladeprensa/boletines/2021/enoe_ie/enoe_ie2021_05.pdf
Ley General de Desarrollo Social LGDS (2004). Recuperado el 4 de diciembre del 2009. Available at: https://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/pdf/264_250618.pdf
Logue, C. M., Miller, E. F. (1995). Rhetorical status: A study of its origins, functions, and consequences. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 81 (1), 20–47. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/00335639509384095
Lustig, N.; Cordera, R., Tello, C. (Eds.) (1984). La desigual distribución del ingreso y la riqueza en México. La desigualdad en México, Siglo XXI. México.
Pastrana, D.; Masiosare, L. (Ed.) (2005). Mucho dinero, pocos resultados. Jornada.
Organización de las Naciones Unidas (2000). Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el desarrollo sostenible.
Pujante, D.; Albaladejo, Rico, C., Río, D. (Eds.) (1998). El discurso político como discurso retórico. Estado de la cuestión, 307–336.
Rodríguez, I. (2006). Revela INEGI profunda brecha entre ingresos de hogares ricos y pobres. La Jornada. México, 22.
Ley de Desarrollo Social. Publicada en el Diario Oficial de la Federación el 20 de enero (2004). Secretaría General de Servicios Parlamentarios. Cámara de diputados del H. Congreso de la Unión
Solís Cruz, J. (2020). Democracia y movimiento étnico en México. Un balance de cara a la Cuarta Transformación. Península, 15 (1). Available at: http://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/peninsula/article/view/75406/66773 Last accessed: 20.07.2021
La superación de la pobreza en México, en el sexenio de Vicente Fox. Recuperado el 27 de noviembre del 2009 de 2011 (2009). Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
Copyright (c) 2022 Oscar Gonzalez Muñoz, Bertha Alicia Arce Castro

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.
Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.