Wildlife crime and rhino poaching in South Africa: a qualitative document analysis of patterns and frequency of visitations of adventurers
Abstract
The study describes rhino poaching as an illicit anti-social behaviour that has constantly been on increase in South Africa. Predominantly, KwaZulu-Natal, and specifically Hluhluwe-iMfolozi Park, became a highly protected zone for biota and wildlife sustainability. However, with environmental crime becoming more sophisticated in this province, criminal justice and anti-poaching teams need to be more equipped continuously with the necessary tools and strategies, required to stand united against wildlife crime. The study adopted document analysis to explore the use of cell phone data records as a forensic investigative instrument for tracing the frequency and patterns of activities of the two largest syndicate groups of rhino poachers from Mpumalanga and Winterveld to Hluhluwe-imfolozi park. Findings unfolded that cell phone records are a viable cellular geographic tool for tracing the footprints, patterns of movement and activities of illegal rhino hunters, affecting the poaching levels at Hluhluwe-imfolozi Park. The study’s findings were incredibly insightful into the behavioural activities of poachers, being one of the first to broaden the lens of cell phone data analysis on this scale. Evidence from the movement analysis revealed that poaching depends on a multitude of factors, such as global pandemic, border control measures, poaching levels rising in reserves, decreased policing measures and a lack of proactive strategies. The study concludes that cell phone data records, considered in isolation, cannot be reflected upon accurately, as a panacea for wildlife crime, without supporting facts from police procedure of intelligence gathering, local knowledge and partnership with local communities. Lastly, within the specific study area, it allows a unique view and perspective of the travel patterns of very sophisticated and advanced syndicate groups, as well as creating room for additional deeply rooted studies of poaching activity and incursions in South Africa.
Downloads
References
Agu, H. U., Gore, M. L. (2020). Women in wildlife trafficking in Africa: A synthesis of literature. Global Ecology and Conservation, 23, e01166. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01166
Mcmurray, C. (2009). Wildlife trafficking: U.S. efforts to tackle a global crisis. Natural Resources & Environment, 23 (3), 16–18.
Buij, R., Nikolaus, G., Whytock, R., Ingram, D. J., Ogada, D. (2015). Trade of threatened vultures and other raptors for fetish and bushmeat in West and Central Africa. Oryx, 50 (4), 606–616. doi: http://doi.org/10.1017/s0030605315000514
Stop the Demand (2022). African Wildlife Foundation. Available at: https://www.awf.org/stop-demand
Okori, J. (2020). African rhinos. Worldwide Fund for Nature. Available at: https://wwf.panda.org/discover/knowledge_hub/endangered_species/rhinoceros/q_a_joseph_okori/
Hluhluwe-iMfolozi Park (HiP) (2022). Wildlife ACT. Available at: https://www.wildlifeact.com/about-wildlife-act/reserves-we-work-on/hluhluwe-imfolozi-game-reserve/
Sterne, M. (2015). The History of Rhino Poaching in South Africa. Rhino Africa Blog. Available at: https://blog.rhinoafrica.com/2015/09/22/history-rhino-poaching-south-africa/
Somverville, K. (2017). Wave of rhino killings points to shifting poaching patterns in South Africa. The Conversation. Available at: https://theconversation.com/wave-of-rhino-killings-points-to-shifting-poaching-patterns-in-south-africa-77806
Minnaar, A., Herbig, F. (2018). The impact of conservation crime on the South African rural economy: A case study of rhino poaching. Acta Criminologica: African Journal of Criminology & Victimology, 31 (4), 147–168.
Ferreira, J., Joao, P., Martins, J. (2012). GIS for crime analysis: Geography for predictive models. Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, 15 (1), 36–49.
Chainey, S., Tompson, L., Uhlig, S. (2008). The Utility of Hotspot Mapping for Predicting Spatial Patterns of Crime. Security Journal, 21 (1-2), 4–28. doi: http://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.sj.8350066
Schmitz, P., Cooper, A. (2007). Using mobile phone data records to determine criminal activity space. IQPC International GIS Crime Mapping Conference. Brussels, 1–29.
Frey, B. (2018). The Sage encyclopedia of educational research, measurement, and evaluation. Thousand Oaks: SAGE. doi: http://doi.org/10.4135/9781506326139
Drisko, J., Maschi, T. (2015). Content analysis. Oxford University Press. doi: http://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190215491.001.0001
Summers, L., Johnson, S. D. (2016). Does the Configuration of the Street Network Influence Where Outdoor Serious Violence Takes Place? Using Space Syntax to Test Crime Pattern Theory. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33 (2), 397–420. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-016-9306-9
Nan, J. (2015). A crime pattern analysis of the illegal ivory trade in China. (TEC Working Paper 1-2015). Canberra: Australian National University. Available at: https://ir.bellschool.anu.edu.au/experts-publications/publications/4450/crime-pattern-analysis-illegal-ivory-trade-china
Andresen, M. A. (2014). Environmental criminology: Evolution, theory, and practice. London: Routledge.
Stanisławski, B. H. (2011). Global black spots: Threats from governance without governments. The National Strategy Forum Review, 20 (3), 1–5.
Copyright (c) 2022 Kajal Singh, Sogo Angel Olofinbiyi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.
Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.
