An afrocentric critique of South Africa’s contemporary knowledge production regime

Keywords: Afrocentricity, Institutions, Knowledge, South Africa, Statute


The politics of knowledge in the world are as old as the cradle of human civilisation. The stakes of knowledge politics are higher in countries that have a rich history of colonialism, such as South Africa, Namibia and Zimbabwe, among others. In the post-apartheid South Africa, there has been a raging scholarly and policy debate about the dynamics of the knowledge industry within our shores. At the centre of this debate has been the role of statutory institutions, such as ASSAf, NRF, universities and research councils. Despite the expressed legislative framework, the role of these institutions in terms of knowledge generation and development has not been applied in line with this framework by their administrators. The policy makers have not yet seriously held them accountable. The consequence is that these administrators have been largely acting not within the national policy framework. In fact, this discourse has largely assumed the form of a conversation between the deaf. Drawing from the fusion of an alternative Afrocentric perspective and interdisciplinary discourse analysis in its broadest form, this paper argues that statutory institutions have an important national role to play in the knowledge industry. But their activities are not above board. If left operating the way they do, their wrong activities have a potential to undermine declared policy measures to the pursuit of true and quality knowledge.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Kgothatso Brucely Shai, University of Limpopo

Department of Cultural and Political Studies


Higgins, J. (2013). Academic Freedom in a Democratic South Africa. Johannesburg: Wits University Press, 272.

About ASSAf. ASSAf. Available at: Last accessed: 12.03.2021

HSRC Act. HSRC. Available at: Last accessed: 13.03.2021

Mandate. NRF. Available at:

Annual Reports. HSRC. Available at:

Motau, K. (2018). SAAPAM Chief Editor ‘threatened’ after rejection of some articles. Eyewitness News. Available at: Last accessed: 03.03.2018

Sithole, M. P. (2009). Unequal Peers. Pretoria: Africa Institute of South Africa.

Asante, M. K. (2003). Afrocentricity: The Theory of Social Change. Chicago: African American Images.

Mazama, A. (Ed.) (2003). The Afrocentric Paradigm. Trenton: Africa World Press.

Azibo, D. A. (2011). Understanding Essentialism as Fundamental: The Centred African Perspective on the Nature of Prototypical Human Nature- Cosmological Ka (Spirit). The Western Journal of Black Studies, 35 (2), 77–91.

Shai, K. B. (2020). Heteroglossia of Changing Scholarship in South Africa: In defence of the Afrocentric Archive. African Journal of Gender, Society and Development, 9 (3), 175–188. doi:

Maserumule, M. H. (2011). Good Governance in the New Partnership for Africa’s Development NEPAD: A Public Administration Perspective. Pretoria: University of South Africa.

Legodi, L. T., Shai, K. B. (2021). (Re)Visiting Molefi Kete Asante’s Theory of Afrocentricity. In Zondi, S. African Voices in Search of a Decolonial Turn. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council, 152–168.

Members of Rating Panels and Meeting Dates (2020). NRF.

Badat, S. (2009). Black Man, you are on your own. Braamfontein: Steve Biko Foundation.

Article in City Press by Msindisi Fengu How dodgy academics rake in the buck (2018). ASSAf & Universities South Africa. City Press.

Mudau, J., Mokgokong, M. J., Khanya, M. P. (2021). Gerentocracy and the Fourth Industrial Revolution in the Public Sector Amid the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Perennial Problem. European Journal of Economics, Law and Social Sciences, 27–43.

Minutes of an Extraordinary General Meeting of Members of South African Association of Public Administration and Management (SAAPAM) (2010). South African Association of Public Administration and Management (SAAPAM). Villa Sterne.

Vale, P. (2014). Presentation. Critical Perspectives on the ASSAf Humanities Consensus Report, Human and Social Dynamics (HSD) Research Seminar Series, Co-hosted by the Department of Science and Technology & HSRC. CSIR Conference Centre.

Consensus Report on Grouped Peer Review of Scholarly Journals in Economics and Business Management (2021). Journal of Public Administration Draft Report. ASSAf.

Makgatho, L. (2022). Workplace debate leads to lawsuit and claim for damages. Available at: Last accessed: 15.08.2022

Résumé: Bonang F. Mohale (2022). University of Pretoria. Last accessed: 15.08.2022

B. Shai, K. (2020). Mokoko Sebola on ‘Scientific Knowledge in Africa’ : an Afrocentric Critique. African Renaissance, 17 (1), 143–156. doi:

Shai, K. B. (2021). Scholarship and Politics in South Africa’s Higher Education System. London: Adonis & Abbey Publishers, 162.

👁 20
⬇ 29
How to Cite
Shai, K. B. (2023). An afrocentric critique of South Africa’s contemporary knowledge production regime. EUREKA: Social and Humanities, (1), 72-80.
Social Sciences