Political participation in the context of contemporary media: the case of refugees in Lithuania
Abstract
This study aims to explore how new communication technologies are transforming the nature of political participation and how social media platforms can create discourses of solidarity with migrants or confrontation with them. The objectives of the study are: to analyse the concept of political participation in the context of migration; to describe the role of new communication technologies in the decision-making process of the host society; and to show the role of social media in increasing refugee integration of migrants and solidarity with them. In order to explore the role of new communication technologies in the context of refugee integration, interviews are conducted with refugees living in Lithuania, whose unique experiences are analysed in the context of not only the role of new communication tools, but also political participation (e.g. citizenship, voting in the elections, meetings with local government representatives, etc.) in their host country.
It should be mentioned, that new communication technologies enable migrants to participate in the communities they have left behind and to create new virtual communities that function as a mobilising instrument for migrants. The analysis of the dynamics between migrant integration and new communication technologies shows that digital technologies facilitate the integration of migrants in social, political, economic and cultural spheres. New technologies can help migrants to find information on rights, citizenship, local migrant support services, and overcome feelings of isolation by providing migrants with information. The results of the interview show that new technologies are very important for refugees, as they help to build networks of family and friends, support communities and create a sense of belonging in the host society. However, negative representations of refugees in social media also contribute to the difficulties refugees face during their integration.
Downloads
References
Kaun, A., Uldam, J. (2017). ‘Volunteering is like any other business’: Civic participation and social media. New Media & Society, 20 (6), 2186–2207. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817731920
Borkert, M., Fisher, K. E., Yafi, E. (2018). The Best, the Worst, and the Hardest to Find: How People, Mobiles, and Social Media Connect Migrants In(to) Europe. Social Media + Society, 4 (1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118764428
Koc-Michalska, K., Lilleker, D. G., Vedel, T. (2016). Civic political engagement and social change in the new digital age. New Media & Society, 18 (9), 1807–1816. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815616218
Skoric, M. M., Zhu, Q., Goh, D., Pang, N. (2016). Social media and citizen engagement: A meta-analytic review. New Media & Society, 18 (9), 1817–1839. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815616221
Smith, L. G. E., McGarty, C., Thomas, E. F. (2018). After Aylan Kurdi: How Tweeting About Death, Threat, and Harm Predict Increased Expressions of Solidarity With Refugees Over Time. Psychological Science, 29 (4), 623–634. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617741107
Castells, M. (2012). Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Cambridge: Polity Press, 306.
Smith, H. J., Cronin, T., Kessler, T. (2008). Anger, Fear, or Sadness: Faculty Members’ Emotional Reactions to Collective Pay Disadvantage. Political Psychology, 29 (2), 221–246. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00624.x
Thomas, E. F., Cary, N., Smith, L. G., Spears, R., McGarty, C. (2018). The role of social media in shaping solidarity and compassion fade: How the death of a child turned apathy into action but distress took it away. New Media & Society, 20 (10), 3778–3798. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818760819
Kende, A., van Zomeren, M., Ujhelyi, A., Lantos, N. A. (2016). The social affirmation use of social media as a motivator of collective action. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46 (8), 453–469. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12375
Bennett, W. L., Segerberg, A. (2012). The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15 (5), 739–768. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2012.670661
Komito, L. (2011). Social media and migration: Virtual community 2.0. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62 (6), 1075–1086. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21517
Komito, L., Bates, J. (2009). Virtually local: social media and community among Polish nationals in Dublin. Aslib Proceedings, 61 (3), 232–244. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/00012530910959790
Hartleb, F. (2017). Political Participation Today: A Radical Shift, But with a Positive or Negative Outcome? European View, 16 (2), 303–311. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12290-017-0458-2
Carpentier, N. (2016). Beyond the Ladder of Participation: An Analytical Toolkit for the Critical Analysis of Participatory Media Processes. Javnost – The Public, 23 (1), 70–88. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2016.1149760
Butsch, R. (2000). The Making of American Audiences: From stage to television, 1750–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 438.
Jenkins, H. (2006). Fans, Bloggers, and Gamers: Media Consumers in a Digital Age. New York: New York University Press.
Boczkowski, P. J., Mitchelstein, E. (2011). How Users Take Advantage of Different Forms of Interactivity on Online News Sites: Clicking, E-Mailing, and Commenting. Human Communication Research, 38 (1), 1–22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2011.01418.x
Van Dijck, J. (2013). The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media. New York: Oxford University Press.
Livingstone, S. (2013). The Participation Paradigm in Audience Research. The Communication Review, 16 (1-2), 21–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2013.757174
Gil de Zúñiga, H., Molyneux, L., Zheng, P. (2014). Social Media, Political Expression, and Political Participation: Panel Analysis of Lagged and Concurrent Relationships. Journal of Communication, 64 (4), 612–634. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12103
Choi, J., Lee, J. K. (2015). Investigating the effects of news sharing and political interest on social media network heterogeneity. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 258–266. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.029
Prochazka, F., Weber, P., Schweiger, W. (2016). Effects of Civility and Reasoning in User Comments on Perceived Journalistic Quality. Journalism Studies, 19 (1), 62–78. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2016.1161497
Ekman, J., Amnå, E. (2012). Political participation and civic engagement: Towards a new typology. Human Affairs, 22 (3), 283–300. doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-012-0024-1
Cairncross, F. (1997). The Death of Distance. London: Orion Publishing Group.
Komito, L. (2001). Electronic communities in an information society: paradise, mirage, or malaise? Journal of Documentation, 57 (1), 115–129. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/eum0000000007080
Castells, M. (2001). The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Castells, M., Fernandez-Ardevol, M., Qiu, J. L., Sey, A. (2006). Mobile Communication and Society: a Global Perspective. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Castles, S., Miller, M. (2003). The Age of Migration: International Population Movements in the Modern World. New York: The Guilford Press.
Vickery, G., Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2007). Participative Web and User-Created Content: Web 2.0, Wikis and Social Networking. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 124. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264037472-en
Komito, L., Hearn, G., Rooney, D. (2008). Information Society Policy. Knowledge Policy: Challenges for the 21st Century. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 83–97.
Larsen, J., Urry, J., Bærenholdt, J. O., Granas, B. (2008). Networking in Mobile Societies. Mobility and Place: Enacting Northern European Peripheries. Aldershot: Ashgate, 89–101.
Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press, 366.
Couldry, N. (2003). Media Rituals: A Critical Approach. London: Routledge, 185.
Fuchs, C. (2014). Social Media: A Critical Introduction. Thousand Oaks: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446270066
Allan, D., Brown, C. (2010). The Mavi Marmara At The Frontlines Of Web 2.0. Journal of Palestine Studies, 40 (1), 63–77. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/jps.2010.xl.1.063
Mainka, A., Hartmann, S., Stock, W. G., Peters, I. (2014). Government and Social Media: A Case Study of 31 Informational World Cities. 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2014.219
Hansen, D. L., Shneiderman, B., Smith, M. A. (2011). Analyzing Social Media Networks with NodeXL: Insights from a Connected World. Burlington: Morgan Kaufmann.
Zheng, L., Zheng, T. (2014). Innovation through social media in the public sector: Information and interactions. Government Information Quarterly, 31, S106–S117. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.01.011
Benkler, Y. (2006). The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Freeman, J., Sobaci, M. Z. (2016). Digital Civic Participation in Australian Local Governments: Everyday Practices and Opportunities for Engagement. Social Media and Local Governments. San Antonio: Springer International Publishing, 195–218. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17722-9_11
Stein, R. L. (2012). StateTube: Anthropological Reflections on Social Media and the Israeli State. Anthropological Quarterly, 85 (3), 893–916. doi: https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2012.0045
Hofmann, S., Beverungen, D., Räckers, M., Beckeret, J. (2013). What Makes Local Governments’ Online Communications Successful? Insights from a Multi-method Analysis of Facebook. Government Information Quarterly, 30 (4), 387–396. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.013
Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., Hansen, D. (2012). The impact of polices on government social media usage: Issues, challenges, and recommendations. Government Information Quarterly, 29 (1), 30–40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.04.004
Warren, A. M., Sulaiman, A., Jaafar, N. I. (2014). Social media effects on fostering online civic engagement and building citizen trust and trust in institutions. Government Information Quarterly, 31 (2), 291–301. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.11.007
Eltantawy, N., Wiest, J. B. (2011). The Arab Spring Social Media in the Egyptian Revolution: Reconsidering Resource Mobilization Theory. International Journal of Communication, 5 (18), 1207–1224.
Jaeger, P. T., Bertot, J. C., Shilton, K., Reddick, C. G., Aikins, S. K. (2012). Information Policy and Social Media: Framing Government-citizen Web 2.0 Interactions. Web 2.0 Technologies and Democratic Governance. New York: Springer Science, 11–25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1448-3_2
Sutkutė, R. (2022). Political Participation in the Context of Contemporary Media: The Case of Refugees in Lithuania. Interview Transcripts, 1–12. Available at: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1VpfKohc2t6pcxm_KEfJpjrnhRmLef1ga/view?usp=sharing
BenEzer, G., Zetter, R. (2014). Searching for Directions: Conceptual and Methodological Challenges in Researching Refugee Journeys. Journal of Refugee Studies, 28 (3), 297–318. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feu022
Kuschminder, K. (2017). Afghan Refugee Journeys: Onwards Migration Decision-Making in Greece and Turkey. Journal of Refugee Studies, 31 (4), 566–587. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fex043
Alencar, A. (2017). Refugee integration and social media: a local and experiential perspective. Information, Communication & Society, 21 (11), 1588–1603. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2017.1340500
Alencar, A., Kondova, K., Ribbens, W. (2018). The smartphone as a lifeline: an exploration of refugees’ use of mobile communication technologies during their flight. Media, Culture & Society, 41 (6), 828–844. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718813486
Tudsri, P., Hebbani, A. (2014). ‘Now I’m Part of Australia and I Need to Know What Is Happening Here’: Case of Hazara Male Former Refugees in Brisbane Strategically Selecting Media to Aid Acculturation. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 16 (4), 1273–1289. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-014-0373-1
Walker, R., Koh, L., Wollersheim, D., Liamputtong, P. (2014). Social connectedness and mobile phone use among refugee women in Australia. Health & Social Care in the Community, 23 (3), 325–336. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12155
Dekker, R., Engbersen, G., Klaver, J., Vonk, H. (2018). Smart Refugees: How Syrian Asylum Migrants Use Social Media Information in Migration Decision-Making. Social Media + Society, 4 (1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118764439
Zijlstra, J., Liempt, I. V. (2017). Smart(phone) travelling: understanding the use and impact of mobile technology on irregular migration journeys. International Journal of Migration and Border Studies, 3 (2/3), 174–191. doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmbs.2017.083245
Lev-On, A. (2010). Engaging the Disengaged: Collective Action, Media Uses, and Sense of (Virtual) Community by Evacuees From Gush Katif. American Behavioral Scientist, 53 (8), 1208–1227. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764209356251
Tudoroiu, T. (2014). Social Media and Revolutionary Waves: The Case of the Arab Spring. New Political Science, 36 (3), 346–365. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2014.913841
McGregor, E., Siegel, M. (2013). Social Media and Migration Research (Working Paper No. 2013-068). Maastricht: United Nations University-Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT). Available at: https://ideas.repec.org/p/unm/unumer/2013068.html
Dekker, R., Engbersen, G. (2014). How social media transform migrant networks and facilitate migration. Global Networks, 14 (4), 401–418. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12040
Lietuvos socialinių tyrimų centro Etninių tyrimų instituto užsakymu atliktos visuomenės nuostatų apklausos 2019 m. rezultatai. Lietuvos socialinių tyrimų centras (LSTC) Etninių tyrimų institutas (2019). Etninių tyrimų institutas.
Bartley, A., Vasu, N., Chin, Y., Law, T. (2014). (Un)problematic multiculturalism: Challenges and Opportunities for Social Cohesion in New Zealand. The Nation: Narratives and Communities in the Asia Pacific. Abingdon: Routledge, 84–110.
Gifford, S. M., Wilding, R. (2013). Digital Escapes? ICTs, Settlement and Belonging among Karen Youth in Melbourne, Australia. Journal of Refugee Studies, 26 (4), 558–575. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fet020
Wilding, R. (2012). Mediating culture in transnational spaces: An example of young people from refugee backgrounds. Continuum, 26 (3), 501–511. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2012.665843
Kennan, M. A., Lloyd, A., Qayyum, A., Thompson, K. (2011). Settling in: The Relationship between Information and Social Inclusion. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 42 (3), 191–210. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00048623.2011.10722232
Sawyer, R., Chen, G. (2012). The Impact of Social Media on Intercultural Adaptation. Intercultural Communication Studies, 21 (2), 151–169.
Brekke, M., Bærenholdt, J. O., Granas, B. (2008). Young Refugees in a Network Society. Mobility and Place: Enacting Northern European Peripheries. Aldershot: Ashgate, 103–114.
Elias, N., Lemish, D. (2009). Spinning the web of identity: the roles of the internet in the lives of immigrant adolescents. New Media & Society, 11 (4), 533–551. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809102959
Copyright (c) 2022 Rūta Sutkutė
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.
Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.