CAUSAL EVALUATIONS OF THE FORENSIC OBJECTS IN THE TRAUMATIC PROCESS
Expert diagnostics of forensic causal determinations should be based on a dialectical-materialistic approach, provided with a modern level of specially applied theoretical knowledge of pathology, etiology and pathogenesis of traumatic processes, as well as stimulated by urgent requests of the theory and practice of forensic medical expertise (FME). The aim of this work is to determine causal estimates of the components of forensic objects: natural and causal – through retrospective causal modelling.
Materials and methods. The research material was archival documents of the Vinnytsia Regional Bureau of Forensics (Ukraine) for 2009–2012 with cases of violent death from injuries. 27 deterministic models were constructed by modelling the regular relationships in traumatic processes.
Result. The qualitative unity of the forensic object is simulated: empirical (natural) and causal (determinant). The existence of an object determinant in concordance of the determinant object with the deterministic object is stated. The method of investigation of the determinants of expertise was proposed – logical retrospective modelling of object determinants dependencies. An assumed model of the dependency model is a multi-link time-chain of forensic medical determination. The adequacy of the proposed method of logical modelling of determinants in forensic examination is confirmed with the help of known scientific knowledge about dual, causal determination, causal diagnostics of determinants and forensic cause and effect relationships. It is proved that forensic expertise is a multidisciplinary branch of science and reflects the realized integration of different scientific knowledge. However, diagnosis of "causes of violent and non-violent death" requires the development of an applied methodology for FME from the standpoint of modern philosophical concepts of causality and general theory of systems, the achievements of which must be used in the construction of the methodology of FME.
Conclusions. From the results of this study, it follows that causation is only a moment of determination, and purely causal modelling as an exploration of a particular type of determination cannot give a complete explanation for the deterministic relationship. The property of necessity of a specific reason determines the tendency, the orientation of development in the form of possibility, which is actualized only by the complete set of determinants - causal and noncausal, conditional.
Ardashkin, A. P. (2004). Metodologicheskie osnovy sudebno-medicinskoi ekspertizy. Moscow, 40.
Fylypchuk, O. V., Hurov, O. M. (2013). Sudovo-medychna kryminalistyka. Kharkiv: Disa plius, 640.
Mohan, H.; Mohan, P., Mohan, T., Mohan, S. (Eds.) (2010). Textbook of Pathology. Printed at Ajanta Press. doi: http://doi.org/10.5005/jp/books/11091
Thompson, R. P., Upshur Ross, E. G. (2017). Philosophy of Medicine. An introduction. Routledge, 1–4. doi:http://doi.org/10.4324/9781315159843-1
Howell, K. E. (2012). An Introduction to the Philosophy of Methodology. University of Plymouth. doi: http://doi.org/10.4135/9781473957633
Herasymenko, O. I. (2002). Slovnyk-dovidnyk terminiv sudovoi medytsyny. Kyiv: Vydavnychyi Dim «In Yure», 484.
Hempel, C. G. (1966). Philosophy of Natural Science. Prentice Hall, 116.
Karmin, A. S., Bernackii, G. G. (2007). Filosofiia. Saint Petersburg: Piter, 560.
Illari, Ph., Russo, F. (2014). Causality: Philosophical Theory meets Scientific Practice. Oxford University Press, 336.
Sachkov, Iu. V. (2003). Evoliuciia ucheniia o prichinnosti. Voprosy filosofii, 4, 101–118.
Copyright (c) 2019 Alla Gavryluk, Viacheslav Voronov, Raisa Zharlinska
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.
Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.