Determination of antimicrobial and fungicidal properties of experimental disinfectant "Sukhodez"

Keywords: disinfection, antimicrobial and fungicidal activity, disinfectant, laboratory, microorganisms, poultry, “Sukhodez”

Abstract

The results of the study of antimicrobial and fungicidal properties of the experimental preparation “Sukhodez” against microorganisms E. coli, Salmonella enteritidis, Staphylococcus aureus and fungi Candida albicans in the laboratory are presented.

The aim of the research. To study the antimicrobial and fungicidal properties of powdered disinfectant and analyze the prospects for its further use in a set of anti-epizootic measures in particular in poultry farms.

Materials and methods. The research was conducted during 2021 at the Department of Veterinary Examination, Microbiology, Zoohygiene and Safety and Quality of Animal Products of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine of Sumy National Agrarian University. Evaluation of bactericidal properties of the experimental agent “Sukhodez” was determined on museum strains of E. coli ATCC 25922, Salmonella enteritidis ATCC 13076 and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538, fungicidal properties were studied on fungi Candida albicans. All cultures were standardized to 109 CFU / cm3.

Results. It is established that as a result of the conducted researches at studying preparation “Sukhodez” antimicrobic properties, it had high efficiency concerning action on strains of both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. It had a detrimental effect on bacteria when applied to concrete at an exposure of 1 hour with a rate of 75 mg per 1 m2, and had the same effect as when applied to a wooden surface, where it expressed antimicrobial action at a rate of 50 mg/m2 after 4 hours. When determining the fungicidal properties, it was found that when exposed to 5 hours, the preparation “Sukhodez” had an effect on study contaminated objects with a rate of 50 mg/m2, and with a rate of 75 mg/m2 inhibited the growth of fungi for 1 hour.

Conclusions. It was found that the most sensitive to the preparation “Sukhodez” were the culture of Salmonella enteritidis – at a rate of 25 g / m2 and action on concrete and wooden surfaces, the disinfectant inhibited the growth of the culture when exposed to 5 hours, and at a rate of 50 g / m2 – for 2 years. Staphylococcus aureus was the most stable bacterial culture, so at a rate of 50 g / m2 on concrete and wood surfaces, bacterial growth was inhibited for 4 and 5 hours, respectively. At the same time, in the study of fungicidal properties, “Sukhodez” showed a fungicidal effect on Candida albicans when applied to a concrete surface at a rate of 50 mg / m2 for 3 hours, when applied to a wooden surface – for 4 hours.

In general, at a rate of 75 g / m2, “Sukhodez” has an instant bactericidal and fungicidal effect on bacteria and fungi applied to concrete and wooden surfaces

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Tetiana Fotina, Sumy National Agrarian University

Department of Veterinary Examination, Microbiology, Zoohygiene and Safety and Quality of Livestock Products

Dasha Slasten, Sumy National Agrarian University

Department of Veterinary Examination, Microbiology, Zoohygiene and Safety and Quality of Livestock Products

Oleksii Fotin, Sumy National Agrarian University

Department of Veterinary Examination, Microbiology, Zoohygiene and Safety and Quality of Livestock Products

References

Hamid, M. A., Rahman, M. A., Ahmed, S., Hossain, K. M. (2016). Status of Poultry Industry in Bangladesh and the Role of Private Sector for its Development. Asian Journal of Poultry Science, 11 (1), 1–13. doi: http://doi.org/10.3923/ajpsaj.2017.1.13
Hemen, J. T., Johnson, J. T., Ambo, E. E., Ekam, V. S., Odey, M. O., Fila, W. A. (2012). Multi-antibiotic resistance of some Gram negative bacterial isolates from poultry litters of selected farms in Benue State. International Journal of Science and Technology, 2 (8), 543–547.
Abstracts from the 5th International Conference on Prevention & Infection Control (ICPIC 2019) (2019). Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control, 8 (Suppl 1), 148. doi: http://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-019-0567-6
Wadud, S., Michaelsen, A., Gallagher, E., Parcsi, G., Zemb, O., Stuetz, R., Manefield, M. (2012). Bacterial and fungal community composition over time in chicken litter with high or low moisture content. British Poultry Science, 53 (5), 561–569. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2012.723802
De Castro Burbarelli, M. F., do Valle Polycarpo, G., Deliberali Lelis, K., Granghelli, C. A., Carão de Pinho, A. C., Ribeiro Almeida Queiroz, S. et. al. (2017). Cleaning and disinfection programs against Campylobacter jejuni for broiler chickens: productive performance, microbiological assessment and characterization. Poultry Science, 96 (9), 3188–3198. doi: http://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex153
Hafez, H. M., Attia, Y. A. (2020). Challenges to the Poultry Industry: Current Perspectives and Strategic Future After the COVID-19 Outbreak. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 7. doi: http://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00516
Barua, H., Biswas, P. K., Olsen, K. E. P., Shil, S. K., Christensen, J. P. (2013). Molecular Characterization of Motile Serovars of Salmonella enterica from Breeder and Commercial Broiler Poultry Farms in Bangladesh. PLoS ONE, 8 (3), e57811. doi: http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057811
Rimi, N. A., Sultana, R., Muhsina, M., Uddin, B., Haider, N., Nahar, N. et. al. (2017). Biosecurity Conditions in Small Commercial Chicken Farms, Bangladesh 2011–2012. EcoHealth, 14 (2), 244–258. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-017-1224-2
Stringfellow, K., Anderson, P., Caldwell, D., Lee, J., Byrd, J., McReynolds, J. et. al. (2009). Evaluation of disinfectants commonly used by the commercial poultry industry under simulated field conditions. Poultry Science, 88 (6), 1151–1155. doi: http://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00455
Islam, K. N., Monira, K. N., Sultana, R., Azharul, I. M. (2007). The effect of Timsen and Ambicide as disinfectant on hatchability traits of Kasila broiler parents eggs in Bangladesh. Livestock Research for rural development, 19, 44.
McDonnell, G., Russell, A. D. (1999). Antiseptics and Disinfectants: Activity, Action, and Resistance. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 12 (1), 147–179. doi: http://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.12.1.147
Muhandiramlage, G. K., McWhorter, A. R., Chousalkar, K. K. (2020). Chlorine Induces Physiological and Morphological Changes on Chicken Meat Campylobacter Isolates. Frontiers in Microbiology, 11. doi: http://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00503
Campagna, M. V., Faure-Kumar, E., Treger, J. A., Cushman, J. D., Grogan, T. R., Kasahara, N., Lawson, G. W. (2016). Factors in the Selection of Surface Disinfectants for Use in a Laboratory Animal Setting. Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science: JAALAS, 55 (2), 175–188.
Pattnaik, S., Subramanyam, V., Kole, C. (2016). Antibacterial and antifungal activity often essential oils in vitro. Microbios., 86 (349), 237‒246.
Papp, S., Kimmerl, K., Gatz, J., Laue, M., Grunow, R., Kaspari, O. (2020). Evaluation of Sporicidal Disinfectants for the Disinfection of Personal Protective Equipment During Biological Hazards. Health Security, 18 (1), 36–48. doi: http://doi.org/10.1089/hs.2019.0128
Golovko, A. M., Pinchuk, N. G., Fotina, T. I., Klishchova, Z. E. (2019). Determination of bactericidal properties of the drug “Saroflox” in relation to museum test cultures of microorganisms. Scientific Messenger of LNU of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies, 21 (95), 89–92. doi: http://doi.org/10.32718/nvlvet9516
Garcês, A. P. J. T., Afonso, S. M. S., Chilundo, A., Jairoce, C. T. S. (2016). Evaluation of different litter materials for broiler production in a hot and humid environment: 2. Productive performance and carcass characteristics. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 49 (2), 369–374. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-016-1202-7
Atapattu, N. S. B. M., Lakmal, L. G. E., Perera, P. W. A. (2017). Effects of two litter amendments on air NH3 levels in broiler closed-houses. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 30 (10), 1500–1506. doi: http://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.16.0873
Paliy, A., Zavgorodniy, A., Stegniy, B., Gerilovych, A. (2015). A Study of the Efficiency of Modern Domestic Disinfectants in the System of TB Control Activities. Agricultural Science and Practice, 2 (2), 26–31. doi: http://doi.org/10.15407/agrisp2.02.026
Pepper, C.-M., Dunlop, M. W. (2021). Review of litter turning during a grow-out as a litter management practice to achieve dry and friable litter in poultry production. Poultry Science, 100 (6), 101071. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101071
Ku, T. S. N., Walraven, C. J., Lee, S. A. (2018). Candida auris: Disinfectants and Implications for Infection Control. Frontiers in Microbiology, 9. doi: http://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00726
Filonov, B. (2003). Methods for checking and assessing the antimicrobial activity of disinfectants and antiseptics: instructions for use. Hygiene and Sanitation, 51 (50).
Gilbert, P., Moore, L. E. (2005). Cationic antiseptics: diversity of action under a common epithet. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 99 (4), 703–715. doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02664.x
Sevilla-Navarro, S., Catalá-Gregori, P., García, C., Cortés, V., Marin, C. (2020). Salmonella Infantis and Salmonella Enteritidis specific bacteriophages isolated form poultry faeces as a complementary tool for cleaning and disinfection against Salmonella. Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 68, 101405. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cimid.2019.101405

👁 31
⬇ 16
Published
2021-10-29
How to Cite
Fotina, T., Slasten, D., & Fotin, O. (2021). Determination of antimicrobial and fungicidal properties of experimental disinfectant "Sukhodez". Technology Transfer: Innovative Solutions in Medicine, 35-38. https://doi.org/10.21303/2585-6634.2021.002124
Section
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine