• Iryna Muratova National technical university of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv polytechnic institute" 37 Peremohy ave., Kyiv, Ukraine, 03056
Keywords: technology, technique, generalization, production, society, social interaction, science, development, technical means


In our opinion, the stages of production development: craft, manufacture, machine production are the historical phases of technology formation and the corresponding division of labor. Social interaction and organization of relations between people in society depend on these factors. The stages of genesis of knowledge and cognition from the pre-scientific level to science, from spontaneous empirical to the conscious theoretical knowledge and its practical application also correspond to the stages of production development. This study reveals the technology as a universal principle of human activity unites production and science, practice and theory. Technology connects with each other not only the goal, means and result of activity into single process, but also unites people in certain social groups, communities, collectives. And because of that, the achieved result is an implemented goal. If a person itself, personality and society become a goal of technological progress, then technology serves social self-development


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Iryna Muratova, National technical university of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv polytechnic institute" 37 Peremohy ave., Kyiv, Ukraine, 03056

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Philosophy


Besomi, D. (1999). Harrod on the classification of technological progress. The origin of a wild-goose chase. BNL Quarterly Review, 208, 95–118. Available at:

Rozin, V. M. (2016). Tekhnika i tekhnologiya: ot kamennykh orudiy do Interneta i robotov. Yoshkar-Ola: Povolzhskiy gosudarstvennyi tekhnologicheskiy universitet, 280.

Rozin, V. M. (2012). Tekhnika i sotsial'nost'. Filosofskiye razlicheniya i kontseptsii. Moscow: Librokom, 304.

Mironov, A. V. (2006). Nauka, tekhnika i tekhnologii: tekhnoeticheskiy aspekt. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriia: Filosofiia, 1, 26–41.

Snitko, D. Y. (2016). Metaphisical background of technology. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, 10, 90–99. doi: 10.15802/ampr.v0i10.87309

Tidwell, A. S. D., Smith, J. M. (2015). Morals, Materials, and Technoscience. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 40 (5), 687–711. doi: 10.1177/0162243915577632

Knyazev, V. N. (1990). Chelovek i tekhnologiya (sotsial'no-filosofskiy aspekt). Kyiv: Lybid, 175.

Kutyrev, V. A. (2001). Kultura i tekhnologiya: borba mirov. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya, 240.

Gorokhov, V. G. (2009). Tekhnika i kul'tura. Vozniknovenie filosofii tekhniki i teorii tekhnicheskogo tvorchestva v Rossii i Germanii v kontse XIX – nachale XX stoletiya [Technology and culture: the emergence of the philosophy of technology and the theory of technical creativity in Russia and Germany in the late XIX – early XX Century]. Moscow: Logos, 376.

Gorokhov, V. G. (2009). Genezis tekhnicheskoy deyatel'nosti kak predmet sotsiologicheskogo analiza [The genesis of technical activities as the subject of sociological analysis]. Prilozhenie k zhurnalu "Filosofskie nauki" [Supplement to journal "Philosophical Sciences"]. Moscow: Gumanitary, 46.

Bagdasaryan, N. G. (Ed.). (2000). Dinamika texnocfery: cotsiokyl'typnyi kontekct [The dynamics of the technosphere: the sociocultural context]. Moscow: Bauman MSTU Publications, 198.

Mamford, L. (2001). Mif mashiny. Tekhnika i razvitiye chelovechestva. Moscow: Logos, 416. Available at:

Neysbit, D. (2005). Vysokaya tekhnologiya, glubokaya gumannost': Tekhnologii i nashi poiski smysla. Moscow: AST: Tranzitkniga, 381.

Gorokhov, V. G. (2012). Tekhnicheskie nauki: istoriya i teoriya (istoriya nauki s filosofskoy tochki zreniya) [Technical sciences: History and theory (the history of science from the point of view of philosophy)]. Moscow: Logos, 512.

Ivanov, B. I., Cheshev, V. V. (2010). Stanovleniye i razvitiye tekhnicheskikh nauk [The emergence and development of technical sciences]. Moscow: URSS, 264.

Kroes, P. (2012). Technical artefacts: creations of mind and matter. Dordrecht: Springer Publ., 280. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-3940-6

Stiegler, B. (1998). Technics and Time, 1 The Fault of Epimetheus. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 316.

👁 551
⬇ 851
How to Cite
Muratova, I. (2018). GENERALIZATION OF TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIAL INTERACTION IN PRODUCTION. Technology Transfer: Innovative Solutions in Social Sciences and Humanities, 19-22.